3rd Debate

Trump is right that the system is rigged in some regards, but he takes it way too far. The media and the Hillary investigation is/was rigged. But the election in and of itself is not rigged.
 
bravesnumberone said:
Trump is so undisciplined.
Click to expand...

How good would Trump be if he was articulate on the issues and disciplined? He's horrible at both, but just think how good of a candidate he'd be if he was good at both. He'd win the election if he were just ok at both. Trump is Bill Clinton, but Bill was articulate on the issues.
 
I think at this point it's obvious that Hillary is going to win. Feels like a cheap win though. Like announcing that your team won the college football national championship after beating Georgia.
 
Trump is why the word ****boy was created

dude is glorified twitter troll that can so easily be baited to look bad it's honestly insane

can't wait for the day this guy isn't president i hope and then watch his failed business venture into tv come down too

he has destroyed his brand forever
 
bravesnumberone said:
I still don't know why I can't shake the feeling that he's going to pull it off.
Click to expand...

Me too. It defies logic. I know that.

Anyways, I think Hillary 'won' tonight in a classical sense. Trump, on the other hand, truly does come across as an over-matched angry white man sometimes - especially when pitted against her. I thought his "nasty woman" interjection was stupid and "tough hombre" was an odd expression to use (but I think very intentional).

This debate was just weird. It didn't give me good vibes at all. The divisiveness is unreal. I mean, let's face it, neither of these candidates is pushing any sort of positive message right now at all. We're talking about nuclear response times for ****'s sake.

Oh yeah - I thought Chris Wallace killed it. Am I alone in that?
 
HRC said again tonight that the wealthy need to pay their fair share in taxes. The top 10% already pay 2/3 of the income taxes. I wish she would say what she thinks is fair. Is it 80%? 90%? 100%?
 
FreemanFan said:
HRC said again tonight that the wealthy need to pay their fair share in taxes. The top 10% already pay 2/3 of the income taxes. I wish she would say what she thinks is fair. Is it 80%? 90%? 100%?
Click to expand...

yes, to all of those

such a fresh take though
 
FreemanFan said:
HRC said again tonight that the wealthy need to pay their fair share in taxes. The top 10% already pay 2/3 of the income taxes. I wish she would say what she thinks is fair. Is it 80%? 90%? 100%?
Click to expand...

If they give you a number, it makes it too difficult to come back for more later. You won't get one.
 
I actually watched about 5-7 minutes (definitely less than 10) of the "debate" last night and I honestly can't grasp how we as a nation would even possibly consider either of those two for VICE president, let alone for president.
 
FreemanFan said:
HRC said again tonight that the wealthy need to pay their fair share in taxes. The top 10% already pay 2/3 of the income taxes. I wish she would say what she thinks is fair. Is it 80%? 90%? 100%?
Click to expand...

Maybe if you would consider that the top 10% own literally 90% of the wealth in this country (check it out if you don't believe me) then that would make a bit more sense.
 
Oklahomahawk said:
I honestly can't grasp how we as a nation would even possibly consider either of those two for VICE president, let alone for president.
Click to expand...

Well, who then?

you said the same thing going back to Obama v McCain and Obama v Romney .
My best guess is you said the same about Bush v Kerry and Bush v Gore (Bush v Gore. Hmmm that has a nice ring to it )
 
Hawk said:
Me too. It defies logic. I know that.

No, that ain't happenin

Anyways, I think Hillary 'won' tonight in a classical sense. Trump, on the other hand, truly does come across as an over-matched angry white man sometimes - especially when pitted against her. I thought his "nasty woman" interjection was stupid and "tough hombre" was an odd expression to use (but I think very intentional).

I agree on all of your points here. I thought there was another would would have been a campaign damaging comment earlier but can't even remember !!

Got lost behind "nasty wman" and his refusal to graciously accept election results

This debate was just weird. It didn't give me good vibes at all. The divisiveness is unreal. I mean, let's face it, neither of these candidates is pushing any sort of positive message right now at all. We're talking about nuclear response times for ****'s sake.

I would be disappointed if a Presidential debate wasn't devisive. Has to do with the stakes.

Let me ask this. When (D) captured the Congress in 2006 did Pelosi stand up and declare (D) would not work with anything POTUS proposed because she was determined to run him out of office?

Didn't think so

I have lost all patience with both sides nonsense.

Bordering on dismissive



Oh yeah - I thought Chris Wallace killed it. Am I alone in that?

Yes. I believe Wallace is this periods best interviewer.

The toughness of his father but a tinge of mischief in his voice
Click to expand...

I think the term "screwed the pooch" is applicable here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top