Right. If he had a track record of staying healthy and pitching like that, it would be different. Or if he had a sub-3 ERA with like a 13+ k/9 (like a bunch of relievers these days have), it would be different. As it is, he's just an oft-injured, not completely dominant RP.
6/19 GDT: San Francisco Giants (26-45) vs. Atlanta Braves (31-37)
- Thread starter WaitingFor2017
- Start date
Right. If he had a track record of staying healthy and pitching like that, it would be different. Or if he had a sub-3 ERA with like a 13+ k/9 (like a bunch of relievers these days have), it would be different. As it is, he's just an oft-injured, not completely dominant RP.
bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
Our starters OPS's last night.. not bad.
ops
0.769
0.778
0.747
0.908
0.933
0.895
0.642
0.742
ops
0.769
0.778
0.747
0.908
0.933
0.895
0.642
0.742
msstate7
Well-known member
Need dh, so in a few weeks it'd be...
0.769
0.778
1.209
0.908
0.933
0.747
0.895
0.642 (steadily rising)
0.742
UNCBlue012
Well-known member
I am absolutely thrilled with Dansby. His start was just horrible, but he's been legitimately good for more than a month now. His errors have stopped a bit as well.
Russ2dollas
10 yr, $185 million Extension
I'm glad he's doing better. I still don't see conerstone piece with him.
Feels like Jeff Blauser.
bravesfanMatt
Steve Harvey'd
I don't know. I think he seems like someone who just gets better. He is good defensively and will grow as a hitter.
Blauser had 3 seasons with an fWAR over 2 (granted, two of them were 5+).
I think Dansby will eclipse that number fairly easily.
sturg33
I
Blauser put up two 5 WAR seasons.
He was inconsistent though.
Feels like Dansby will fluctuate between 1-4 WAR pretty regularly
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Felt like Blaussr only was good in contract years.