And his results got worse, so I think he didn't realize the issue.
Some people are just super extremist on this site. Enscheff and I have said a couple times that we think he'll be a decent major league regular type but that we need more than that in LF for our team because our offense has so many of those players in the lineup already. Basically he's a useful piece that's not a great fit for our team.
I think he's got a great shot to be a .750-.780ish OPS/1.5-2 WAR guy in the majors myself, but we need more than that to develop a decent offense and make our team competitive. Someone made a Matt Diaz comparison in another thread, and I think that's a good one. Apparently that makes me "super low on him".
Hopefully he continues to develop well and surpasses my expectations, we could definitely use a nice corner OF prospect close to the majors. Worst case scenario (both for him and Mallex) he seems like he could make a really nice platoon partner for Mallex in one of the corner spots.
My counter to the basic argument is that there are a lot of ways to build an offense. Freeman has to be more consistent, but if we can get one more middle-of-the-order guy to pair with him, guys like Dustin Peterson could fit quite easily.
The issue there is if he's playing LF (and isn't making a big jump to be a low to mid .800 OPS guy), we have to find a 20-25 HR guy to play at 3B, and those are exceptionally hard to find. Now if you are talking about him replacing one of Mallex or Ender, then sure he works fine regardless. But if we are putting him in LF with those two we will need a huge bat at 3B or we will likely have one of the bottom 25% offenses in baseball even with Albies and Swanson. And even the Mets are struggling to be a playoff team with a top 3 pitching staff and bottom 5 offense. Given that we are unlikely to be close to the Mets pitching until guys like Allard, Fried, and Soroka get up to the majors in 2019 we will need a big jump in offense to compete. And plugging in Peterson in LF and a decent 3B isn't going to make that happen I don't think.
The talk about Dustin not fitting is revolving around him not fitting into our current lineup because we only have two spots to fit a bat, LF and 3B (C as well, but there are no prime years Buster Poseys or McCanns for us to sign or trade for to plug in there). Now if it's him and Ender or Mallex or a him in a platoon with Mallex he'd work very well I think.
Someone made a Matt Diaz comparison in another thread, and I think that's a good one. Apparently that makes me "super low on him".
I'm not quite sure why people keep limiting him to a platoon guy. Yes, he has hit very well against lefties this year, but he has also put up a .276/.327/.414 line against righties. He actually hit better against righties than lefties in 2015.
I like how you bring up the worst year Diaz had in the minors there smootness, ignoring that he posted OPS around .900 in A+ ball, AA the next year, and in AAA. Diaz showed a bunch of pop all throughout the minors, which Peterson has not. The main comparison for me was Diaz was a guy who in his peak with us could post a mid .750ish OPS against righties and rake lefties. I think that is Peterson's likely upside, and would put him in the high .700s OPS overall and make him around a 2 WAR player.
Now is there a chance he manages to start posting .800 OPS against righties at some point and becomes much better than that, sure. But he's going to have to hit for much more power against righties than he's shown so far to get there.
The thing I really like about Dustin Peterson is that he is a 21 year old at AA who has improved his strike out rate in each month, has shown at the very least good doubles power, and still has room to grow into some more home run power.
Peterson is developing pretty rapidly. His BA and OBP have increased each of the last 3 years, even while he was moving up levels. His SLG has also increased overall, though it did dip slightly last year before this year's significant improvement. His ISO also dipped last year but has increased overall. His K rate has improved at each level, and his BB rate improved a lot last year before taking a slight step back so far this year.
So he is improving his ability to hit, get on base, while hitting with more power and striking out less...all while moving up a level every year.
We are being very aggressive with Peterson for a reason. Again, I see Diaz as more of a floor for Peterson than a realistic projection, and it certainly isn't his ceiling.
And being young for his level (right?).
Diaz had multiple years where he posted mid .800s OPS over his first 4 years in the majors, and was basically a 2-2.5 WAR guy when healthy his first 4 years with us. I think the main person being discounted here is Matt Diaz, he was a pretty solid piece when he was with us.. I don't think by any stretch that Peterson's floor is a 2 WAR guy in the majors, I think that's a positive outcome for him.
Technically very young for his level, in reality about in the middle of the typical range for good prospects at the level.
Good prospects tend to be 18-19 at A ball, 19-20 in A+, 20-22 in AA, or at least that's certainly the way it seems.
It may not be his literal floor, but I do believe he's pretty likely to end up being better than Diaz. I know Diaz was valuable for us; he had a clear role and was very good in that role. He was also 28 before he got his first real taste of consistent time in the majors. I think Peterson has a very good chance to be better than Diaz was when he's 28.
I think it's safe to say Peterson is our most polarizing prospect
Newcombe b/c we gave up Simba and he walks ppl.
Some people are just super extremist on this site. Enscheff and I have said a couple times that we think he'll be a decent major league regular type but that we need more than that in LF for our team because our offense has so many of those players in the lineup already. Basically he's a useful piece that's not a great fit for our team.
I think he's got a great shot to be a .750-.780ish OPS/1.5-2 WAR guy in the majors myself, but we need more than that to develop a decent offense and make our team competitive. Someone made a Matt Diaz comparison in another thread, and I think that's a good one. Apparently that makes me "super low on him".
Hopefully he continues to develop well and surpasses my expectations, we could definitely use a nice corner OF prospect close to the majors. Worst case scenario (both for him and Mallex) he seems like he could make a really nice platoon partner for Mallex in one of the corner spots.