Apparently. 1.1 WAR last season, 0.8 this year. Maybe those numbers at Baseball Reference are wrong though.
So over the last 160 games played, he's at 1.9 WAR?
Apparently. 1.1 WAR last season, 0.8 this year. Maybe those numbers at Baseball Reference are wrong though.
Wait a minute - wasn't the first half of your reasoning for this thread that Markakis (and his 0.9 WAR) should be kept around??? Color me confused.
The thing is, Puig was been playing well enough for over a month now (.300 batting average and .830 OPS since returning from the DL). It certainly would appear that this demotion is more about his attitude than performance.
Yes it is, hence the "buying low". The idea is to "buy low" on a 4-5 WAR talent and hope his attitude issues go away as he becomes older than 25. That's why it's called "buying low".
If he was a 4-5 WAR talent and a model citizen he wouldn't be available for the Braves to "buy low".
Do we all understand what "buying low" means?
You missed the point my post.
Since he's been playing well and the Dodgers still are requiring a huge return, it sounds like an excellent idea.
Since he's been playing well and the Dodgers still are not requiring a huge return, it sounds like an excellent idea.
Which is why I said "If he becomes an extreme buy low option". "Requiring a huge return" would not be "buying low", now would it?
This whole "buying low" concept is apparently harder to grasp than I assumed.
Is something going on in your personal life, dude? Every single one of your posts is talking down to someone. Even if you're correct with some of it, you're still an asshole.
I don't know why anyone else even bothers to have an opinion. All we need is a message board where you tell us what's right and wrong.
Mainly because it's amusing to come back and read your whiny post about how mean I am.
You're such a sensitive little guy! Awww! Mommy will be by soon to tuck you in for your nappy time!
Mainly because it's amusing to come back and read your whiny post about how mean I am.
You're such a sensitive little guy! Awww! Mommy will be by soon to tuck you in for your nappy time!
Mainly because it's amusing to come back and read your whiny post about how mean I am.
You're such a sensitive little guy! Awww! Mommy will be by soon to tuck you in for your nappy time!
Discussions with you would be much more productive without the insults and condescending crap.
There are a few reasons why it might be a good buy low trade. He's a name who is entertaining and can draw some fans. He's still only a kid at 25. He's got a big ego, and he'll want that Cespedes money when he sees what he signs for this offseason which could cause him to catch fire in his contract year to be traded.
With all that being said I just don't see us taking the chance on him. With a young clubhouse you cannot have a cancer like him. I'd hope that since he's only 25 that he'd mature and start acting like an adult, but it seems that Cuban baseball players are very immature and feel way too entitled. I could see us acquiring him, and flipping him later for a better prospect, but the damage that he could do in the mean time may make it all for naught.
There are a few reasons why it might be a good buy low trade. He's a name who is entertaining and can draw some fans. He's still only a kid at 25. He's got a big ego, and he'll want that Cespedes money when he sees what he signs for this offseason which could cause him to catch fire in his contract year to be traded.
With all that being said I just don't see us taking the chance on him. With a young clubhouse you cannot have a cancer like him. I'd hope that since he's only 25 that he'd mature and start acting like an adult, but it seems that Cuban baseball players are very immature and feel way too entitled. I could see us acquiring him, and flipping him later for a better prospect, but the damage that he could do in the mean time may make it all for naught.