And Acuna started 0-14 - your point was about people bailing on him because of a very few ABs, no? Why is a handful from Tucker any different? How many of those balls were hard hit? Several. Just as importantly, how many other players have 0-9 or 0-14 stretches before you choose to bail on them?
It was a few ABs to start the year that gave people the idea that Tucker should hold Acuna down. Neither should hold any weight. It's Acuna's position and the only reason he's not there now is to control that extra year. Once that is done he should be up.