When you come to savannah or when we have a beer I'll explain to you why it's 100x worse where I live
Jeff I think that's almost the norm everywhere. It's not what you know, but who you know.
When you come to savannah or when we have a beer I'll explain to you why it's 100x worse where I live
I think I'd need about ten more beers in me before I heard that explanation.
I'm of the opinion that, to keep it simple, a lot of white people will hire a white person over a black person, or won't hire a black person, solely based on race. White people hold most positions of power. I also feel a lot of black people are born in to a disadvantage that aids in making them "not the best candidate," when what's being asked could be done by them just fine with some learning.
Just to put my 2 cents worth in, I think Affirmative Actions laws are crazy, just like Hate Crime Laws. There shouldn't be any possible need for either, but the absolute troubling truth of the matter is that they are necessary, because of 100+ years of good people not doing the right thing because the individual victims weren't anyone they gave a sh!t about and more often than they wanted to admit the perp was someone they knew and/or did give a sh!t about. This is one of my biggest problems with authority, leaders, administration, management, elected officials, highly paid spin doctors, etc., they're all about getting the plaudits and the respect and the money of being a "somebody" but when it comes right down to it, they don't have the nads to do the right thing unless they can do it without losing their power base. This is also at the root of the #1 biggest problem with the education quality in the public schools.
So why are we supposed to believe affirmative action is the best way to solve these problems? Seems like a very lazy solution to the problem. AA obviously has its problems and it really doesn't get to the root of the issue. I just don't think it's the best way to fix the problem. We're competing in an international world these days and weakening the workforce through AA and other policies seems like a bad idea.
So why are we supposed to believe affirmative action is the best way to solve these problems? Seems like a very lazy solution to the problem. AA obviously has its problems and it really doesn't get to the root of the issue. I just don't think it's the best way to fix the problem. We're competing in an international world these days and weakening the workforce through AA and other policies seems like a bad idea.
I agree that flat-out quotas would be a lazy and misdirected way to go, but as I understand this particular instance, Michigan's race-conscious policy awarded "points" based on race, but that wasn't the sole determining factor in whether or not an applicant was accepted. The question that needs to be answered are what are the goals and mission of higher education. How much latitude should an admissions system have in putting together its student body in attempting to fulfill that mission?