So, I agree with you on all but one of DJT's kids but that's not good enough?
You didn't 'think' he'd qualify.
There is no thinking. Especially when compared to the disaster we are seeing right now out of the Democrats choice.
So, I agree with you on all but one of DJT's kids but that's not good enough?
So, I agree with you on all but one of DJT's kids but that's not good enough?
You didn't 'think' he'd qualify.
There is no thinking. Especially when compared to the disaster we are seeing right now out of the Democrats choice.
Only because you have absolutely nothing to base that off of other than your own minor case of TDS.
OK, you and I agree that Hunter is a POS, right? So, what has he ever been "proven" guilty of? I guess I should be honored that you only think I have a "minor case of tds", huh?
There is video of Hunter being a POS.
Actually lends more credibility of his foreign ties for sure because who would want to pay that guy as a consultant?
Proven as in video evidence that nobody is denying is him?
So, video evidence is all you need? Again, I'm already agreeing with you about Hunter Biden, but unless something is proven in court would that "legally speaking" prevent Joe from bringing in Hunter as "an adviser"?
I don't want any child of any president to make important governmental decisions. I'm surprised you don't agree on this one.
Problem with this is you have calendar age and 'feel' age. But a cap of 75+ seems reasonable to me.
I think it absolutely depends on the child. If you are good at what you do it doesn't matter who your parents are.
Maybe, but isn't that pretty much 100% subjective, depending on the person doing the judging? Wouldn't that bring about 100% of Dem voters being OK with Dem presidents having their kids in their administrations and 100% of Repub voters being OK with Repub presidents having their kids in the government? Also, isn't "being good at what you do" also pretty subjective? It may not be 100% like those other things but it would be pretty close, and wouldn't it bring a LOT of projection into the picture, ie Dem voters hate Trump so they automatically hate all of his kids, and Repub voters hating Biden so they hate his kid(s)? I agree that Hunter isn't a very good or fair example here but you get my basic point, right?
They cannot begin their Presidency once they hit age 70. Their first term can run through 74 and if they are doing a good job the voters would re-elect them for a second term.
So you could be President at 69 run and finish first term at 73 or 77.
I think Chelsea would be a fine advisor. I think Trumps kids would be fine advisors.
I think Hunter Biden is a degenerate POS that should be nowhere near the presidency.
This isn't hard.
I know a few 'oldies' in my time in corporate America that were extremely sharp.
Its a case by case basis.
If it's case by case rhen you can't have an age cap. Or then your corporate guys need to run sooner.