So you assume they have a choice? They can't force anyone to sign anything?
I guess I'm not seeing where this is so one sided as you. Could entirely be my poor reading comp bc today has been a bear.
Maybe the demands of each player would be so financially onerous that negotiations really are an intractable proposition, at least at this time, but the organization's general posture vis-à-vis retaining Heyward long-term—with Wren, but now much more with Hart—doesn't make it appear that they intend to do everything they reasonably can to extent him (or Upton, for that matter).
And—not that you're suggesting otherwise, but just by way of elaborating my point—offering some ~$15-million per season, take-it-or-leave deal is not reasonable; that's an undersell to either player, both in terms of the salaries of the Braves roster and the current economic climate in baseball.
is that what we offered?
I don't know exactly what the Braves have offered—only that it's purportedly substantially below the ~$200-million total value his agent is apparently pushing for (and which the market dictates he can probably fairly easily obtain). My only point in throwing that out there was, as I said, to elaborate the point that there's a huge gap between "making an offer" and "making a reasonable effort to resign," and thus it's no so black-and-white as "they can't force anyone to sign anything."
Who rebuilds one of the youngest teams in baseball with talent like Teheran, Heyward, Justin, Gattis, Wood, Kimbrel, Freeman, Simmons, etc etc? What a joke.
Heyward and Justin are likely gone 1 yr from now anyways. All you're doing by keeping them is giving it 1 more run with basically the same team that finished below .500 this yr. Except this yr you have to replace the production from Harang, Santana, and Floyd.
Is this team as constructed currently able to beat the Nationals over a full season? That's an important question the brass has to answer.
No more than the Royals at the start of the 2014 season were constructed to beat the Tigers or the Giants at the start of 2014 were constructed to beat the Dodgers.
Don't think that's the right question. The right question to me is does the team have a realistic chance to get one of the lottery tickets to the playoffs, even the wild card. And I think the answer is yes. But with respect to individual trades, the question should be is the return good enough. As long as it is (even if a chunk of that return is spread over future years) I do the trade, even if it involves my favorite player.
That is better, thanks.
I guess I'm not as positive with this manager and the offensive performance we just put up "as currently configured" I think it's a long shot.
Chances are we cant replicate the pitching we got this year.
That is better, thanks.
I guess I'm not as positive with this manager and the offensive performance we just put up "as currently configured" I think it's a long shot.
Chances are we cant replicate the pitching we got this year.
Regression makes it likely that our pitching will not be as good as in 2014 and our hitting will not be as bad.
My impression is that the team's Plan A at the moment is to go with an outfield of Gattis, Heyward and Justin. They are willing to listen to offers for all of those guys, but I don't think there is any sort of fire sale. Imo the things we have to get done this season are: 1) to pick up a starting pitcher to slot in with Minor, Teheran and Wood, with Hale the #5 and 2) to move one of the BJ/CJ contracts (probably not in its entirety). That second priority is less important for 2015 than it is for creating some payroll flexibility in 2016 and 2017.
Don't rebuild just reload.
That is better, thanks.
I guess I'm not as positive with this manager and the offensive performance we just put up "as currently configured" I think it's a long shot.
Chances are we cant replicate the pitching we got this year.
That is better, thanks.
Chances are we cant replicate the pitching we got this year.