I'm willing to see what happens after jitters and better weather, but this is all underwhelming and worrisome. We've heard for a while now that he's had a hard time even sitting at 90... The straight fastball is also concerning... depending on what scouting report you read, going into the draft his fastball was supposed to be a 60 or 65 FV pitch sitting 92-94 with the ability to touch 96. I read one report that said his Fastball was already a plus pitch going into the draft. It baffles me that the velocity has fallen off that drastically with no injuries. I guess it could have been his back issue? But it still sounds like that was a minor thing in the end.
All this talk of dope spin-rates and injury questions reminds me I’m still disappointed Carter Stewart isn’t pitching in the organization.
FA: 89.4 mph (Grade 36.0), 4.3" HMov (Grade 45.2), 7.7" VMov (Grade 38.2)
This is an unusable FA. Slow, straight. Simply not a MLB quality pitch without Grade 80 command.
CU: 73.4 mph (Grade 31.5), 2.9" HMov (Grade 62.3), -5.1" VMov (Grade 53.7)
The curve is a slow bender that looked legit on TV, and the data shows that it is in fact legit. This is a 55.
CH: 9.1 mph delta (Grade 56.6), 6.5" HMov (Grade 41.5), 4.2" VMov (Grade 52.9)
This change is a 50, and definitely usable at the MLB level.
So we are looking at a 35 FA, 55 CU and 50 CH. A junk baller at the age of 21.
Will the velocity tick up 2-3 MPH? Even if it does, it's still a horridly straight pitch, but at least it would be usable.
It was rainy. It was his first start. I know all the excuses that will be tossed around by the Allard fans. The fact is that poor FA and mediocre off speed stuff limits his upside to a #5 or AAAA guy, and it is clear why he plummeted down the prospect lists despite good results. I was really hoping to see a slow FA with tons of movement that made it play way up, or a truly knock out curve that he could rely on, but that isn't the case.
The funny thing about facts is that they don't require you to believe them to remain true.
The funny thing about facts is that they don't require you to believe them to remain true.
I think he’s more saying that it’s mind-boggling that a 20-year-old is both a junk-baller and dominating AAA, not that the facts disagree with the truth.
That was my take away.
I think he’s more saying that it’s mind-boggling that a 20-year-old is both a junk-baller and dominating AAA, not that the facts disagree with the truth.
It's really not a bad question. Given that the numbers say he shouldn't be successful, why has he nonetheless been successful so far? Asking the question is not disbelieving the numbers, it is trying to better understand what they are telling us.
It has to be very unusual for a 20 year old to be successful in AAA. It is also unusual for a guy with his pedestrian stuff to be successful in AAA. So, there must be something going on to explain why a guy with both of those things working against him has been successful in AAA. Answering that question could go a long way in determining his future... if, in fact he has a future in baseball.
my guess is all his pitches are a little better than they showed last night...it does appear his curve is his best pitch...probably the one he goes to for a strikeout
As a fellow team Allard, I'm concerned, but not giving up