Another Example of Juror Bias in DC

Garmel said:
Well, you have to question stuff when a lawyer who commits fraud against the FISA court gets no time and is back practicing law while Bannon goes to prison for refusing to testify to congress.

The ability libs have to ignore the reality before them is amazing.
Click to expand...




Whats your opinion on whataboutisims again?
 
Bannon gets sentenced to prison.



Garmel - what about Clinesmith who in my opinion did something worse and got no jail time.
 
like I said, this isnt hard, a simple google search
///////////////////////////////


By JOSH GERSTEIN 10/06/2014 03:04 PM EDT
A federal judge has declined a House committee's bid to have Attorney General Eric Holder held in contempt of court — and perhaps even jailed — for failing to turn over documents related to the Justice Department' s response to Operation Fast and Furious.

However, in a ruling Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson also denied Holder's request for an indefinite stay of her prior order that the attorney general must turn over any "non-privileged" documents the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed as part of an investigation into the botched gunrunning investigation. The judge previously ruled that Holder must give the panel any documents that are not both predecisional and deliberative in nature.

Jackson called the House contempt motion "entirely unnecessary" and said it was evident that she was considering the government's motion to lift her prior order. "Under those circumstances, the Court finds no basis to hold defendant in contempt," she wrote.

But the judge also said she saw no reason to allow the Justice Department to withhold unprivileged documents until the case was complete. She ordered those records turned over to the committee by Nov. 3, along with a log of the records claimed to be privileged.

"Though the Court has the discretion to grant a stay in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, pending appeal or otherwise, there is no pending appeal here and the Court has already ruled that defendant has no legal basis to withhold non-deliberative documents. The 'possibility' of an appeal and piecemeal litigation does not satisfy defendant’s burden to demonstrative a 'clear case of hardship or inequity' without a stay," she wrote in her decision (posted here).

A Justice Department spokesman welcomed the decision, at least the part rebuffing the motion to hold Holder in contempt. "We are pleased that the court rejected the committee's latest stunt," spokesman Brian Fallon said.

A spokesperson for the House committee said the judge's ruling is a step towards the panel receiving documents it should have been given years ago. "The Oversight Committee is pleased that the Judge in the case has rejected the Department's request to continue illegally withholding documents and its attempt to unnecessarily prolong the proceeding. This court ruling affirms that Attorney General Holder broke the law in withholding subpoenaed documents, which led the House of Representatives to vote him in criminal contempt," said the spokesperson.

////////

remind me the chairman of said committee
 
Holder is a part of the system and system protects the system.

Bannon is disruptive to the system and the system destroys the disruptors.

I'm sure trump is next.
 
Bannon had an office in the White House and was one time one of the Chairman of Trumps election campaign

Enough with the " outsider"
 
I guess no one is outraged that this judge is allowing a convicted criminal to circulate in society while appealing his conviction. Shocks the sensibilities. Both that the judge is doing it and that the law-and-order boyz are not expressing any outrage.
 
Last edited:
I think we can all call a spade a spade.

Continuing to justify it as "fair" just makes y'all look like the pathetic stooges you are. The system is very to lucky to have so many of you
 
Many years ago... I would have said the opposition needs to be better. We need to live by our morals. And we need to uphold the law.

Today. I want revenge. I want punishment. I want a lot of it. I don't care which laws and norms need to be broken to achieve it.

I suspect I'm not alone in that thinking
 
sturg33 said:
Many years ago... I would have said the opposition needs to be better. We need to live by our morals. And we need to uphold the law.

Today. I want revenge. I want punishment. I want a lot of it. I don't care which laws and norms need to be broken to achieve it.

I suspect I'm not alone in that thinking
Click to expand...

the imaginary moderate sturg of years gone by...how i miss him...the old sturgie would never fall for something like the Seth Rich hoax...would he now

but i foresee a dénouement
 
Last edited:
Fair is a plea from a 5 year old
as in

P: " you must go to bed"
5yr old: " it's not fair"

who said anything
about fair.
/////////
 
nsacpi said:
the imaginary moderate sturg of years gone by...how i miss him...the old sturgie would never fall for something like the Seth Rich hoax...would he now

but i foresee a dénouement
Click to expand...

Did you ever comment about the recent fbi raid on a journalist by the way?

I must have missed it. #putinproud
 
How did Wikileaks get the data if we know in congressional testimony that there was no physical proof of a hack on the DNC server?

THis is the part where nsacpi doesn't respond......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top