Another Example of Juror Bias in DC
- Thread starter nsacpi
- Start date
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
An Arizona judge has ordered sanctions against Mark Finchem and his attorney over false claims they made about election fraud after Finchem, the Republican candidate for Arizona secretary of state, lost his race in November and refused to accept the results.
Weeks after the election, Finchem sued his Democratic opponent, Adrian Fontes, and then-Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D), challenging the results of the vote and requesting that a new election be held. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian tossed his suit in December, saying it was groundless.
Fontes and Hobbs asked the court in December to sanction Finchem, according to the Arizona Republic, saying his case was “a politically motivated weaponization of the legal process meant to perpetuate the dangerous narrative that our elections are unreliable, our elected leaders are corrupt, and our democracy is broken.”
In a new ruling last week, Julian agreed, ordering Finchem and his lawyer, Daniel McCauley III, to cover legal fees for Fontes and Hobbs, who both won their November races and have since assumed new roles as Arizona’s secretary of state and governor, respectively.
In her ruling, Julian noted that Arizona law sought to discourage lawsuits without “legitimate basis in fact or law,” but also emphasized that sanctions should be awarded only in rare cases, so as not to discourage legitimate challenges.
https://wapo.st/3yi92Pv
interesting ruling
Weeks after the election, Finchem sued his Democratic opponent, Adrian Fontes, and then-Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D), challenging the results of the vote and requesting that a new election be held. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian tossed his suit in December, saying it was groundless.
Fontes and Hobbs asked the court in December to sanction Finchem, according to the Arizona Republic, saying his case was “a politically motivated weaponization of the legal process meant to perpetuate the dangerous narrative that our elections are unreliable, our elected leaders are corrupt, and our democracy is broken.”
In a new ruling last week, Julian agreed, ordering Finchem and his lawyer, Daniel McCauley III, to cover legal fees for Fontes and Hobbs, who both won their November races and have since assumed new roles as Arizona’s secretary of state and governor, respectively.
In her ruling, Julian noted that Arizona law sought to discourage lawsuits without “legitimate basis in fact or law,” but also emphasized that sanctions should be awarded only in rare cases, so as not to discourage legitimate challenges.
https://wapo.st/3yi92Pv
interesting ruling
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
maybe one of you buddies (or da wife) can help you with that one
Tapate50
Well-known member
I don’t believe any of them can help me understand Alzheimer’s thought process
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
They do? News to me.
You would know if you were truly intellectually curious but Jin reality you’re a fraudulent intellectual who is driven by your hysterically awful bias.
Yes - Sweden did better than all European countries. Ready to admit you were wrong?
61 of the 70 areas that had failing machines were in republican areas. I'm sure it was just a coincidence.
At times where more Republican voters turn out.
It’s all going to come to a head. Lots of things will come out of what was found in San Joaquin.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Those DC juries. I'm telling ya. Cant trust em.
Such an intelligent response. After being duped on the insurrection narrative I'm surprised you showed up this morning.
Tapate50
Well-known member
It is either Alzheimer's or Dementia
Think its a lack of IQ personally.
Especially considering what we've seen from the DC justice system of late I'd say making a snark remark about DC juries was not exactly the smartest thing to do.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
And no one was prevented from voting because of failing machines. Every Kari Lake lawsuit her "Experts" are forced to admit under oath that no one was prevented from voting because of failing machines. There is an available alternative voting method. I know of one guy who claims to have turned this down and went home instead because he didnt believe his vote would be counted if he voted that way. Unfortunately turning down voting when presented with an available method at the voting center isnt being disenfranchised even if they could find 17k of people like this.