Another Example of Juror Bias in DC

Garmel said:
Such an intelligent response. After being duped on the insurrection narrative I'm surprised you showed up this morning.
Click to expand...


I like how these people just declare themselves right on things no one agrees they were proven right about and then circle jerk about it.
 
cajunrevenge said:
And no one was prevented from voting because of failing machines. Every Kari Lake lawsuit her "Experts" are forced to admit under oath that no one was prevented from voting because of failing machines. There is an available alternative voting method. I know of one guy who claims to have turned this down and went home instead because he didnt believe his vote would be counted if he voted that way. Unfortunately turning down voting when presented with an available method at the voting center isnt being disenfranchised even if they could find 17k of people like this.
Click to expand...

Did you also know (of course you didn't) there were thousands of people who were standing ln line when the polls closed? Did you know that many people signed affidavits that because of the lines they couldn't vote? There was much more than just this especially considering there was no chain of custody.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
Sounds like someone didn't watch the tapes.
Click to expand...


I havent but excuse me if I dont take people like you and thethe who have gotten 95% of everything wrong on face value. The bar for me to take this seriously is one defendant getting his conviction overturned. After the whole Durham hoax I feel the need to point out to you specifically the phrase "for me to take this seriously" does not mean I concede you win if that does happen. Like I said, I havent seen whats been newly released and wont unless there is a reason to.
 
Garmel said:
Did you also know (of course you didn't) there were thousands of people who were standing ln line when the polls closed? Did you know that many people signed affidavits that because of the lines they couldn't vote? There was much more than just this especially considering there was no chain of custody.
Click to expand...

How many people signed affidavits that they tried to vote and couldnt.
 
Garmel said:
Did you also know (of course you didn't) there were thousands of people who were standing ln line when the polls closed? Did you know that many people signed affidavits that because of the lines they couldn't vote? There was much more than just this especially considering there was no chain of custody.
Click to expand...


Theres only one party that supports a set in stone deadline for getting in votes that wouldnt allow these polling places to stay open until everyone got a chance to vote and it aint the Republicans. So sorry if I dont shed a tear at your own parties shenanigans backfiring on you. Besides that there was voting available for nearly a month as well as voting by mail. By law allowing those people to vote after closing time for the polls would make them illegal votes and we know how Republicans feel about counting illegal votes.....
 
cajunrevenge said:
I havent but excuse me if I dont take people like you and thethe who have gotten 95% of everything wrong on face value. The bar for me to take this seriously is one defendant getting his conviction overturned. After the whole Durham hoax I feel the need to point out to you specifically the phrase "for me to take this seriously" does not mean I concede you win if that does happen. Like I said, I havent seen whats been newly released and wont unless there is a reason to.
Click to expand...

Says the guy who said that woman couldn't be on a jury. I bet you're still whacking to Michael Avenatti posters hanging up on your wall.
 
Last edited:
cajunrevenge said:
Theres only one party that supports a set in stone deadline for getting in votes that wouldnt allow these polling places to stay open until everyone got a chance to vote and it aint the Republicans. So sorry if I dont shed a tear at your own parties shenanigans backfiring on you. Besides that there was voting available for nearly a month as well as voting by mail. By law allowing those people to vote after closing time for the polls would make them illegal votes and we know how Republicans feel about counting illegal votes.....
Click to expand...

This is just laughable. It was asked if the voting hours could be extended because of the issues and a democrat judge turned it down.
 
Garmel said:
Says the guy who said that woman couldn't be on a jury. I bet you're still whacking to Michael Avenatti posters hanging up on your wall.
Click to expand...


And I am still correct. She served on a fact finding grand jury that had the ability to recommend indictments based on the evidence. If it goes to a criminal grand jury that will be a whole separate group of people. And then if there is an indictment and it goes to trial there will be a whole new set of jurors, but please do point her out for me when we get to these trials in the jury pool.
 
Tapate50 said:
Coulda just stopped here.

The rest is just you making yourself feel better about sticking your head in the sand and aligning with the wrong people on most topics
Click to expand...


Well sorry if I dont take the people who are consistently wrong and post hoax after hoax on face value. If there is in anything even remotely close to potentially exonerating evidence it would get many convicted people a new trial. Until then theres no reason to believe the boys who cried voter fraud.
 
cajunrevenge said:
And I am still correct. She served on a fact finding grand jury that had the ability to recommend indictments based on the evidence. If it goes to a criminal grand jury that will be a whole separate group of people. And then if there is an indictment and it goes to trial there will be a whole new set of jurors, but please do point her out for me when we get to these trials in the jury pool.
Click to expand...

LOLOLOLOL!!! Watching you try to lie your way out is hilarious. WTF do you think you're trying to fool? Nobody believes this crap. Lay off the drugs, bud.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Well sorry if I dont take the people who are consistently wrong and post hoax after hoax on face value. If there is in anything even remotely close to potentially exonerating evidence it would get many convicted people a new trial. Until then theres no reason to believe the boys who cried voter fraud.
Click to expand...

lol. You're a complete ****ing buffoon. I bet life kicks you in the ass every day.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Well sorry if I dont take the people who are consistently wrong and post hoax after hoax on face value. If there is in anything even remotely close to potentially exonerating evidence it would get many convicted people a new trial. Until then theres no reason to believe the boys who cried voter fraud.
Click to expand...

The guy who believes in corrupt cops, doesn't believe in impartial court systems. You would have been more correct just agreeing with Thethe than BL or goldy. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

I've heard it all folks.
 
Garmel said:
This is just laughable. It was asked if the voting hours could be extended because of the issues and a democrat judge turned it down.
Click to expand...


Again, a month to vote in person and the ability to vote by mail. They had plenty of chances to vote. Do you deny that I am saying the exact same thing you would if the situation was reversed? I know its hard for you to grasp complicated concepts but I do not support closing any polling center while there is a line until everyone has voted no matter how long it takes but I have no sympathy for your own parties shenanigans backfiring on you.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Again, a month to vote in person and the ability to vote by mail. They had plenty of chances to vote. Do you deny that I am saying the exact same thing you would if the situation was reversed? I know its hard for you to grasp complicated concepts but I do not support closing any polling center while there is a line until everyone has voted no matter how long it takes but I have no sympathy for your own parties shenanigans backfiring on you.
Click to expand...

What a stupid POV. You have a right to vote on ELECTION day. You know what election day is, right? That's the day you vote.
 
Garmel said:
LOLOLOLOL!!! Watching you try to lie your way out is hilarious. WTF do you think you're trying to fool? Nobody believes this crap. Lay off the drugs, bud.
Click to expand...


Does this mean you wont be pointing her out to me in the jury pool at the trials? I cant even make sense of what you trying to do. My best guess is you somehow interpreted my comment about the Jury foreperson to mean that she wouldnt be serving in the fact finding grand jury? I dont know how any reasonable person could conclude that considering her being the Jury foreman was the whole topic we were talking about. What next, accuse me of not knowing this is a Braves forum.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Does this mean you wont be pointing her out to me in the jury pool at the trials? I cant even make sense of what you trying to do. My best guess is you somehow interpreted my comment about the Jury foreperson to mean that she wouldnt be serving in the fact finding grand jury? I dont know how any reasonable person could conclude that considering her being the Jury foreman was the whole topic we were talking about. What next, accuse me of not knowing this is a Braves forum.
Click to expand...

Just keep lying if it makes you feel better. Anybody can go back and read what you said.
 
On a personal note I don't like liars and that's what you are, Cajun. Is that how you score your drugs?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top