Another Example of Juror Bias in DC

Garmel said:
What a stupid POV. You have a right to vote on ELECTION day. You know what election day is, right? That's the day you vote.
Click to expand...


They had something like 300+ hours in total in which to vote and they showed up in the last 2 and are mad they didnt get to vote. I fully support making all polling places stay open until everyone in line has voted in every state. If your party at the least introduced some legislation fixing this for everyone I would have some sympathy for them but as usual they just want to get special treatment for themselves and everyone else it happens to can **** off. This was a problem of your own parties making. They insist on the hard deadline. They insisted on pushing election day voting instead of early voting and voting by mail. We dont even know the amount it would have effected the election. Its not enough evidence to overturn a Republican win so why would it be enough to overturn a Democrat win'?
 
Tapate50 said:
The guy who believes in corrupt cops, doesn't believe in impartial court systems. You would have been more correct just agreeing with Thethe than BL or goldy. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

I've heard it all folks.
Click to expand...


And who holds the majority in the highest court in the land? Its just embarrassing how little you people understand my position on cops, the courts, and law enforcement.
 
Garmel said:
Just keep lying if it makes you feel better. Anybody can go back and read what you said.
Click to expand...


And only an idiot would interpret it that way. Theres a reason I include disclaimers specifically just for you.



Disclaimer for Garmel, the you I am referring to is you.....as in Garmel.... the poster on the Chopcountry forums.... not Matt Garmel in Wisconsin. Sorry, felt the need to be very specific because I never know where you are going to get lost.
 
nsacpi said:
good to know!

how many people signed affidavits that they tried to vote and were not able to
Click to expand...

I don't remember the exact amount. It was in the hundreds. Did your media tell you something different? I know the game you're playing. However, that stuff is just the tip of the iceberg on what happened. The lack of chain of custody was a doozy. When they brought the ballots to Runbeck to vote they ended up with 35,000 more than the reported coming in. That's a problem. Without chain we don't know where all of those votes came from.
 
Garmel said:
I don't remember the exact amount. It was in the hundreds. Did your media tell you something different? I know the game you're playing. However, that stuff is just the tip of the iceberg on what happened. The lack of chain of custody was a doozy. When they brought the ballots to Runbeck to vote they ended up with 35,000 more than the reported coming in. That's a problem. Without chain we don't know where all of those votes came from.
Click to expand...

I know you're a little busy with cajun at the moment. But when you have time perhaps we can discuss this. Let me know if you have a source or link regarding number of such depositions. I'm genuinely curious.
 
cajunrevenge said:
And only an idiot would interpret it that way. Theres a reason I include disclaimers specifically just for you.



Disclaimer for Garmel, the you I am referring to is you.....as in Garmel.... the poster on the Chopcountry forums.... not Matt Garmel in Wisconsin. Sorry, felt the need to be very specific because I never know where you are going to get lost.
Click to expand...

You're a liar and I'd tell that to your face. You got caught being uninformed and you're trying to BS your way out of it.
 
nsacpi said:
I know you're a little busy with cajun at the moment. But when you have time perhaps we can discuss this. Let me know if you have a source or link regarding number of such depositions. I'm genuinely curious.
Click to expand...

You can look at Lake's paperwork to the court. She uses Maricopa's own documents against them.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
You're a liar and I'd tell that to your face. You got caught being uninformed and you're trying to BS your way out of it.
Click to expand...


You would never make it to my face because when I give you directions to take a left you will start spinning in place and claim its my fault. You can make believe whatever you want. No one is dumb enough to believe what you are selling.
 
lol. You said she wouldn't make it on a jury pool. SURPRISE! She was the foreman.
 
Last edited:
I think anyone else is smart enough that when someone says that responding to breaking news story about the foreperson in a fact finding grand jury that I am talking about the potential criminal trial.
 
I've had some fights with the lecturer. I can honestly say I don't recall him ever lying to me. However, you are.

cajunrevenge said:
Intellectually she is Trumps peer. I wouldnt bet against her if she and Trump took an IQ test. I havent seen all the clips but I didnt hear her say anything bad about Trump. As usual you feel the need to try to distract from the real topic. She wont even be on anyones jury pool. The evidence is clear as day in this case.
Click to expand...
 
cajunrevenge said:
I think anyone else is smart enough that when someone says that responding to breaking news story about the foreperson in a fact finding grand jury that I am talking about the potential criminal trial.
Click to expand...

You're full of ****. You ****ed up so just man up.
 
Last edited:
" She wont even be on anyones jury pool."


Thank you for providing the relevant quote. Now just tell me the name of the person whose jury she served on and we can wrap this up real quick.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Intellectually she is Trumps peer. I wouldnt bet against her if she and Trump took an IQ test. I havent seen all the clips but I didnt hear her say anything bad about Trump. As usual you feel the need to try to distract from the real topic. She wont even be on anyones jury pool. The evidence is clear as day in this case.
Click to expand...

Then you contradict yourself here. First, she's an idiot like Trump. Now this.

cajunrevenge said:
Why shouldnt she be on a jury? She seems of average intelligence for a person in the US these days. Clearly she didnt go to college to get that full liberal indoctrination so would not be shocked to find out she likes Trump.
Click to expand...
 
Garmel said:
lol. She handled Trump's case and a few others. Are you really trying to wordsmith "anyone"
Click to expand...


It was a fact finding grand jury. Its not specific to any person. The context that we were talking about the juror foreperson should have clued you in that I was talking about the individual criminal trials. You are just so desperate to try to catch me saying something wrong because I call out you and the other Stooges for your BS.
 
Garmel said:
Then you contradict yourself here. First, she's an idiot like Trump. Now this.
Click to expand...


I defended her mental ability to serve on a jury. Unfortunately she aint far off from average intelligence these days. And she did serve on a fact finding grand jury.
 
cajunrevenge said:
It was a fact finding grand jury. Its not specific to any person. The context that we were talking about the juror foreperson should have clued you in that I was talking about the individual criminal trials. You are just so desperate to try to catch me saying something wrong because I call out you and the other Stooges for your BS.
Click to expand...

We've all caught you making an ass out of yourself. I have to admit that you're quite entertaining. You shift the goalposts quite well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top