I thought that was Bryce Harper?
Just joshing. I mean the deal doesn't matter for the Angels. But it has a negative impact on us. So I'm really more concerned about us.
My belief about Harper has not changed in the slightest.
I thought that was Bryce Harper?
Just joshing. I mean the deal doesn't matter for the Angels. But it has a negative impact on us. So I'm really more concerned about us.
My belief about Harper has not changed in the slightest.
Including your belief that he would be better than Trout in 2013![]()
I think Miggy ages more like Manny. I think he'll always be a great hitter.
If he didn't get hurt he would have given him a run for his money. But he did get hurt so I was wrong.
Wow, kind of interesting that it includes a NTC. I'm guessing he doesn't want to be auctioned off like the Marlins.
I'mguessing since they used the word extension means this deal bought out 2 years of FA. Assuming even 40M per for those years, that means his pre-arb years are being valued at least at approx 60M. Angels are freaking dumb. As an arb 1, I can't see him making more than like 7M. He's a super 2 so an exception regardless. But still, I believe his closest comp in terms of matching would have been Miggy who wasn't a super 2. Service time and PA does matter with arb, when Miggy was Arb 1 he had just shy of 2400 PA, which to get to that Trout would need 900 PA this season which is virtually impossible.
In 10 years we will look back at WAR and say why the hell did we use that. Just like we do with any stat.
Seriously?
1- Baseball ecomomics are ridiculous right now.
2- Trout had two of the best seasons EVER at 20-22 years old.
3- There is no way thats an overpay, he may go down as one of the top 5 players all-time, maybe the best.
It's a fine deal.
Whats the alternative, play it out every year in arb and let him walk?
They at least got 2 FA years.
It doesn't drive up salaries because nobody can make a case they have had similar production to Trout. You're being ridiculous right now my friend.
Trout should break the standard.
Wow, kind of interesting that it includes a NTC. I'm guessing he doesn't want to be auctioned off like the Marlins.
I'mguessing since they used the word extension means this deal bought out 2 years of FA. Assuming even 40M per for those years, that means his pre-arb years are being valued at least at approx 60M. Angels are freaking dumb. As an arb 1, I can't see him making more than like 7M. He's a super 2 so an exception regardless. But still, I believe his closest comp in terms of matching would have been Miggy who wasn't a super 2. Service time and PA does matter with arb, when Miggy was Arb 1 he had just shy of 2400 PA, which to get to that Trout would need 900 PA this season which is virtually impossible.
In 10 years we will look back at WAR and say why the hell did we use that. Just like we do with any stat.
In 10 years we will look back at WAR and say why the hell did we use that. Just like we do with any stat.
The components may change as we get more advanced data (namely from the defensive side) but the concept won't. The idea is to know exactly how good a player is compared to his peers. That drives everything in the sport. Counting stats do not and that has been apparent for quite some time.
William Ladson @washingnats 4m
#Nats RHP Doug Fister could miss a month of the season because of the lat strain. #Nationals #MLB
I get that completely. I'm not saying the concept of deviation from the average will change. Just the way we determine what inputs go into the calculation of a deviation.
I can see that. Especially with the new system MLB is putting in regards to defense. Plus eventually getting to scoops by 1B and pitch framing by catchers. I think the offensive side is as close to perfect as it can get. A few tweaks here and there but a linear weights offensive component is the way to go.
edit: and baseball prospectus has done some good work regarding catcher defense too.