Bachmanmania!

goldfly said:
cause if you tell me it is a human and all life is a plan from God

then it means it was Gods plan for your father to rape you and have a baby

making up scenarios where the fetus/baby is more important than the others is weird if you are trying to tell me how precious they all are
Click to expand...

Not everyone argues it that way though.
 
sturg33 said:
Well, we either believe it's a living human baby or we don't. Just because a mother is raped, doesn't mean the baby should be murdered.
Click to expand...

You can also argue that you simply don't know if it's a living baby. And since we don't know at the very least it would be nice to minimize abortion as much as possible. So it's rational to expect people to have a very good reason before they choose to abort a fetus. Rape, incest, etc. are some of those reasons. Irresponsibility, maybe not such a good reason.

Also, we all know abortion is here to stay and the extreme position of ending all abortions has very little chance of ever seeing the light of day. So in a more practical sense you're just trying to compromise, because it's better to potentially save thousands of lives than no lives at all isn't it?
 
yeezus said:
I don't understand the relevance here.

My gf is a RN, and the crap she tells me about, I would get queasy doing.

That doesn't mean I think no one should do it.
Click to expand...

I thought it went without saying, but I suppose that was giving you too much credit.

But the reason she "wouldn't feel right about doing it" was a moral issue, not a physical/ability/queasy issue
 
yeezus said:
I don't understand the relevance here.

My gf is a RN, and the crap she tells me about, I would get queasy doing.

That doesn't mean I think no one should do it.
Click to expand...

I guess you missed the "mutilate innocent human life" bit.

You guys are pieces of work.
 
weso1 said:
You can also argue that you simply don't know if it's a living baby. And since we don't know at the very least it would be nice to minimize abortion as much as possible. So it's rational to expect people to have a very good reason before they choose to abort a fetus. Rape, incest, etc. are some of those reasons. Irresponsibility, maybe not such a good reason.

Also, we all know abortion is here to stay and the extreme position of ending all abortions has very little chance of ever seeing the light of day. So in a more practical sense you're just trying to compromise, because it's better to potentially save thousands of lives than no lives at all isn't it?
Click to expand...

And here sadly are couple of other things we know: we all know that it is an innocent living human in the womb that is being killed and we pretty much all know that the pro-abortion folks don't want to compromise any.
 
goldfly said:
cause if you tell me it is a human and all life is a plan from God

then it means it was Gods plan for your father to rape you and have a baby

making up scenarios where the fetus/baby is more important than the others is weird if you are trying to tell me how precious they all are
Click to expand...

Well, I guess I can be grateful that you haven't trotted out your "parasite" line yet.
 
sturg33 said:
I thought it went without saying, but I suppose that was giving you too much credit.

But the reason she "wouldn't feel right about doing it" was a moral issue, not a physical/ability/queasy issue
Click to expand...

That's wonderful.
I wouldn't feel right about her having an abortion if she were to get pregnant, and I'm confident we would keep it. Personally, I wouldn't do it. I wouldn't feel right (about having an abortion, that is).
But not everyone is me, so, they can choose if they feel it's right for them.
I'm not even sure where I addressed you, but whatever. Carry on with your senseless, dense arguments. We all know you're great at that. Not something to be proud of.
 
BedellBrave said:
I guess you missed the "mutilate innocent human life" bit.

You guys are pieces of work.
Click to expand...

You said:

"So you want women to be able have someone else mutilate innocent human children in their wombs, even though you being the one slicing the child up would make you too queazy?"

So, you misspoke, I suppose, but what YOU said was "you slicing up the child would make you too queasy," meaning me (you) literally "slicing the child up" myself.

It's simple English. Not too difficult. Don't speak literally if you don't mean to, and use "one" instead of "you" appropriately.
 
yeezus said:
You said:

"So you want women to be able have someone else mutilate innocent human children in their wombs, even though you being the one slicing the child up would make you too queazy?"

So, you misspoke, I suppose, but what YOU said was "you slicing up the child would make you too queasy," meaning me (you) literally "slicing the child up" myself.

It's simple English. Not too difficult. Don't speak literally if you don't mean to, and use "one" instead of "you" appropriately.
Click to expand...

Thank you kind sir.
 
I'm sorry you guys but I had to report this exchange (oh and I apologize for the language):

eb9.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top