BANKING CRASH

sturg33

sturg33

I
Seems quite a bit worse than the CRYPTOCRASH... And quite a bit more important. These are all have a half dozen have already failed. Seems bad

What does Paul Krugman think?

[Tw]1653406861859643400[/tw]
 
Weird I thought the lecturing buffoon was an economist.

Weird silence on this seemingly highly relevant and important topic

I guess bard doesn't have a script yet
 
Its going to get worse when the credit crunch starts and more depositors will pull their money.
 
It's strange. The lecturing buffoon had 16 posts on the first two pages of the CRYPTOCRASH thread.

Zero in this one.

So very weird. If only an academic can explain it
 
Our entire financial system is completely fiction. And people are starting to realize it.

The system is panicking

[Tw]1653900700991078403[/tw]
 
Am I supposed to feel sorry for banks with bad business practices? This is what happens with the free market. Incompetent businesses fail and the competent succeed. We could regulate these banks to make sure this stuff doesn't happen but that's communism.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Am I supposed to feel sorry for banks with bad business practices? This is what happens with the free market. Incompetent businesses fail and the competent succeed. We could regulate these banks to make sure this stuff doesn't happen but that's communism.
Click to expand...
I think we found Jamie Dimon’s burner account.
 
It's great that our tax funded public servants are able to consistently get rich off these stock moves

Being a public servant is highly lucrative

We should give them even MOAR power

[Tw]1654265159144333313[/tw]
 
Btw is it weird that the "economist" lecturer is more interested in posting about proud boys, crypto crashes, gas stoves, and permits more than the collapse of the US banking system?

So very strange
 
Any theories from the critical thinkers as to why the academic "economist" is so uninterested in the major economic event?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top