Bill O'Reilly on Fox News being Fair to Obama

Krgrecw

**NOT ACTUALLY RACIST
Since it's slow in here.....

Bill O’Reilly must feel pretty secure about his standing with his colleagues at Fox News, or else he’s past caring.

Answering a question from fellow Foxer Geraldo Rivera—does the right-leaning network cut President Obama enough slack? Does it treat him fairly?—the cable outlet’s prime-time star didn’t seem especially worried whose toes he stepped on.

“It depends on the hour,” the host of The O’Reilly Factor told a sold-out crowd at the 92nd Street Y Wednesday night. “If you watch Fox & Friends, [Steve] Doocy is an Obama-basher. He bashes Obama like clockwork. But the other two—Elisabeth [Hasselbeck] and Brian [Kilmeade]—they’d rather whip up a soufflé.”

“Rather whip up a soufflé”—a wonderful compliment or a withering dis? We report, you decide.

O’Reilly went hour by hour through the channel’s daytime lineup, claiming that morning hosts such as Bill Hemmer and Jenna Lee “have no ideology.” As for the noon offering, “Outnumbered or Outsmarted, those people, I don’t know,” he said with a dismissive shrug, prompting audience laughter. “Then, at 3, Shepard Smith is a liberal.” He added that Cavuto, hosted by Fox News senior vice president and managing editor Neal Cavuto, “is a business show…He’s not an Obama fan.”

O’Reilly continued, “The five people on The Five, they don’t like the president so much…At 6, it’s the signature show with Bret Baier, he’s not anti-Obama.”

“He’s a very solid newsman,” Rivera chimed in.

“Then you have Greta [van Susteren], who’s a liberal. At 8 you have me. I’m tough on everybody. At 9 you have Megyn [Kelly]. Again, not an ideologue…Then you have the Republican show, Hannity, at 10”—a flippant observation that drew a couple of knowing chuckles from audience members who might suspect that there’s no love lost between O’Reilly and Sean Hannity.

Assessing Fox’s would-be competitors, O’Reilly said of left-leaning MSNBC, “They’ve radicalized themselves…I get a headache. Al Sharpton is giving me a headache.” He was somewhat more generous to CNN, telling Rivera: “They’re good at what they do, covering the news. But they don’t have any flamboyant, obnoxious people like you and me. Wolf Blitzer looks like a U-Boat commander. You expect the periscope to come down.”

He's 100% spot on.
 
Lol he's still very anti-Obama and MSNBC is no more radicalized than Fox.
I think O'Reilly is more liberal than he lets on, but he knows what sells and knows his audience is a bunch of scared, paranoid freaks.
 
Lol at Van Susteren being a liberal.

Has Bill O ever seen her interviews with Sarah Palin? You can't get a more softball interview than that where she's basically leading Palin on with kindergarten questioning.

As for O'Reilly, there was a joke that Bill used to be far right, and once Fox News hired Beck that Beck made O'Reilly look like a moderate.
 
I used to listen to O'Reilly's radio show when it was available in the Mpls/St. Paul market and I found that show to be a lot different than his television show (which I rarely catch). O'Reilly can be a smarmy know-it-all, but I don't mind him as much as the other folks on Fox (can't stand Greg Gutfeld). Could be a generational thing for me.
 
Pretty spot on analysis. Hard to disagree with it. O'Reilly definitely leans more right then he thinks, but other than that pretty solid.
 
What about the Fox regular contributors like Coulter and Rove?

It's not always the host that makes their shows outrageous...

O'Reilly and Hannity are enough to make FOX right-leaning. And again, you'd hardly think Van Susteren was a liberal with her softball interviews to Palin in which she didn't even once consider attacking Sarah.
 
I mean it's clearly a right network. It's not as bad as MSNBC though, imo which has just taken it to an extreme level.
 
Pretty spot on analysis. Hard to disagree with it. O'Reilly definitely leans more right then he thinks, but other than that pretty solid.

Agree. He often dresses it up with a "this is simply common sense" approach that ignores any complexity. Both sides do that.

I don't watch much MSNBC, but I have a hard time taking anything Al Sharpton says seriously. I do like Ed Schultz.
 
He's talking about his own profession, the one thing he's an expert on. Once the topic goes to politics he's just another blowhard with an opinion.
 
Has Bill O ever seen her interviews with Sarah Palin? You can't get a more softball interview than that where she's basically leading Palin on with kindergarten questioning.

.

That's just how you have to talk to Palin in general to get anything that's even halfway intelligent.

You guys know I hate Fox, but it's more the format than the leanings that I find irritating. I hadn't realized how bad the other networks were as well as I rarely watch.

O'Reilly isn't likeable necessarily, but he will on occasion surprise me with admissions of being wrong, or call out a side I didn't expect, etc.

I just don't think Americans need 24 "news", but my mom who agree's with my political views said "yeah, and you don't need ESPN or MLB network either." Burn. :)
 
24 hour news networks are terrible. Because they force a need to sensationalize news to keep things interesting. Maybe 2 24 horus news stations are all that are needed. Don't need CNBC, MSNBC, Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, and CNN INternational. Coudl just roll them up to an all encompassing business/stock with news station.
 
I know and why it used to not be quite so bad. But it's all changed in the modern era and changed for the worst. Of course I wouldn't want any 24 hour news. Totally unnecessary in the internet era.
 
I'm just going to say it. I think news coverage is as good as it's ever been. If you don't want to listen to opinion news and watch news stories 24 hrs/day then don't watch it. It's that simple.

I love that we have so much coverage though from different perspectives. I think we're getting a lot more news coverage these days because of the right leaning networks and blogs from the right and the left. If you don't like it then you're probably just an idealogue.

I personally don't watch much news because the stories are typically incredibly depressing. But it was like that before the rise of cable news.
 
I'm just going to say it. I think news coverage is as good as it's ever been. If you don't want to listen to opinion news and watch news stories 24 hrs/day then don't watch it. It's that simple.

I love that we have so much coverage though from different perspectives. I think we're getting a lot more news coverage these days because of the right leaning networks and blogs from the right and the left. If you don't like it then you're probably just an idealogue.

I personally don't watch much news because the stories are typically incredibly depressing. But it was like that before the rise of cable news.

Wow
 
Interesting that this thread was made and right on cue Megyn Kelly came out and asked Cheney probably the toughest question he's ever been asked. Really went after him and it was a fair question.

She leans right, but she really does ask good tough questions to both sides. Wish we had more news folks like her.
 
Kelly and O'Reilly are 2 people on fox who have a soul. The rest though....

Hannity might as well wear a giant elephant tattoo on his face
 
I was very disappointed when FNC dumped Colmes and went strictly with Hannity. Felt like it was a much better show when it was homer dem and homer pub. It was a reaction to what MSNBC had done. They went 100% dem homer and Fox responded in kind. Still wish Fox wouldn't have done that.

Hannity is unwatchable because he's such a ridiculous homer.
 
Interesting that this thread was made and right on cue Megyn Kelly came out and asked Cheney probably the toughest question he's ever been asked. Really went after him and it was a fair question.

She leans right, but she really does ask good tough questions to both sides. Wish we had more news folks like her.

I cut and pasted a yahoo headline news article from last night.
 
Back
Top