weso1
<B>Clique Leader</B>
With the important difference that the last guaranteed year of Howard's deal is his age 36 season, whereas Freeman's takes him through his age 31 season. Any deal has to be judged on the basis of future expected performance and the age difference is very important in that regard.
It is also worth noting that Howard signed his deal almost two full years before his prior deal was due to expire. So it had some of the risk/security tradeoffs of the kind of deals that players in their pre-free agency years agree to.
It is hard not to conclude that the Freeman contract is quite a bit more team-friendly than the one the Phillies gave to Howard.
Yeah, I just don't think you can't compare it to Howard's deal. It's apples and oranges.