Braves sign Freeman to 8 year 135M deal! *Updated to 135m*

With the important difference that the last guaranteed year of Howard's deal is his age 36 season, whereas Freeman's takes him through his age 31 season. Any deal has to be judged on the basis of future expected performance and the age difference is very important in that regard.

It is also worth noting that Howard signed his deal almost two full years before his prior deal was due to expire. So it had some of the risk/security tradeoffs of the kind of deals that players in their pre-free agency years agree to.

It is hard not to conclude that the Freeman contract is quite a bit more team-friendly than the one the Phillies gave to Howard.

Yeah, I just don't think you can't compare it to Howard's deal. It's apples and oranges.
 
8/135 is a market value deal. Assume he makes about 25M or so in arb (may not be that high but just assuming say 5/8/12) that makes him 5/110 or so which is about market, Howard signed a 5/125 but had an MVP and big homer stats.

Market value deal now maybe, but maybe not market value deal in 2 years. TV markets are rapidly changing the market.
 
Market value deal now maybe, but maybe not market value deal in 2 years. TV markets are rapidly changing the market.

That's highly speculative. There'a a very real chance we've hit the spending bubble about now. Remember that it remained stagnant for a few years until the Angels/Dodgers/Rangers selling spree. Most teams don't want to hit the luxury tax so they'll dodge it.
 
Well Howard's extension was signed inwhat was the equivalent of his last season of arb.

But he had the ROY and MVP. Which Freddie doesn't.

I'm not complaining about the Freddie deal, I love it. But it's not a bargain deal, it's a great signing because of his youth, but it's not like we Evan Longoria'd him.

Seriously??? This is exactly why some people can't stand the "numbers-based" community.

EVERY SINGLE NUMBER anyone's thrown out reflects that the deal SHOULD at worst be break-even for either side.

Freddie Freeman is "that guy" that you want to build your roster around if you want to be a contender. His numbers thus far line up with ANYONE, and you want to classify it as "not a bargain"???

Freeman may very well have just become the last player in the history of the franchise to have a legitimate chance at being the "Next Chipper". One thing your models miss is that my nieces' kids may be buying #5 jerseys 10-12 years from now. Make sure to build in those inflated dollars when you try to justify things...my first Chipper jersey cost me $10 - you can't get one for less than 125% of that today.
 
plus, I imagine the average salary will rise quite a bit over the next 8 years. Really liking the deal.
 
I agree, buying out only arby years gains us no further team control, only cost certainty.

Quite a few of these posts are like reading Twitter feeds without the hashtags. Some of you guys need to learn the value of patience. Considering we've waiting all winter long, giving a few hours for details to emerge isn't expecting much.
 
plus, I imagine the average salary will rise quite a bit over the next 8 years. Really liking the deal.

Yeah, this looks like a market value deal today, but keep in mind free agent salaries have nearly doubled since 2009 and the new national tv deal just went into effect so in 2 or 3 years this extension may look like a steal. Plus since FF is so young, we get the benefits of backloading the contract without the cost of his decline years.
 
plus, I imagine the average salary will rise quite a bit over the next 8 years. Really liking the deal.

You can say that about any contract signed. Generally they look less bad or better over time, that shouldn't be in your evaluation of when a contract is signed. For all we know the market could collapse and it could look worse (odds are certainly against that of course) but you assess contracts based on the market, hence about market value.
 
I'm not jumping up and down about this deal because it was pretty much market value, but it was one that needed to be made. There is a lot more that goes into giving a guy a huge deal when you're a mid-market team, and Freeman hits all those intangibles just like Mac and Chipper did. He is young, he wants to be a Brave, he isn't looking to squeeze every FA dollar he can, he is a great teammate, fans love him, he is durable, people view him as "clutch", etc, etc.

Worst case scenario (assuming no catastrophic injury) is probably Freeman producing at roughly his current level (800-850+ OPS) and the Braves pretty much break even on the deal. If his power continues to improve, which is easy to see happening with such a large man, this deal could be a steal.

Let's just hope he doesn't come into 2014 trying to "prove he deserves" this new contract. We've all seen how that can turn out.
 
Wren is good at trades and signing our current players. Ask him to bring in a free agent and craps the bed.
 
Freeman: "We’ve got a young, dynamic core, and they’re going to try to keep us together, so it’s definitely nice to see.”

Tweeted by Dave O'Brien.
 
Freeman: "We’ve got a young, dynamic core, and they’re going to try to keep us together, so it’s definitely nice to see.”

Tweeted by Dave O'Brien.

Glad to hear. Olney has an insider article where he says the Freeman contract means we can't afford Heyward and Kimbrel. I agree on Kimbrel, but that is b/c of him being a closer, not b/c of Freeman. I think we'll have FF type money for Heyward with Uggla gone. Just have to see if Heyward wants that or wants to max his value.
 
“We’ve looked to solidify our ballclub going forward, and literally for the last couple of months we’ve been putting together a plan that culminated with this signing,” said Wren, seated next to Freeman and manager Fredi Gonzalez during a news conference Wednesday at Turner Field.

“We’re looking at how we can keep our team together, especially our young, homegrown players, and we have a lot of collaboration from (Braves CEO) Terry McGuirk and (team president) John Schuerholz to make sure this franchise stays strong. And we looked at how we could strategize to make that happen.”

Wren said part of that strategy is linked to increased revenues the Braves expect to get from the move in 2017 to a planned new ballpark in Cobb County. The Braves’ payroll is expected to climb to about $100 million this season, from $90 million in 2013. It still will likely be just below the median major league payroll.

The Braves are counting on increased attendance and revenues at the new ballpark and its planned adjoining retail and entertainment village to help offset the relatively small amount they get from their local TV deal that’s well below other teams’ recent deals.

Link to full article: http://www.ajc.com/news/sports/baseball/wren-says-freeman-contract-first-big-step-in-brave/ndD5b/
 
“We’ve looked to solidify our ballclub going forward, and literally for the last couple of months we’ve been putting together a plan that culminated with this signing,” said Wren, seated next to Freeman and manager Fredi Gonzalez during a news conference Wednesday at Turner Field.

“We’re looking at how we can keep our team together, especially our young, homegrown players, and we have a lot of collaboration from (Braves CEO) Terry McGuirk and (team president) John Schuerholz to make sure this franchise stays strong. And we looked at how we could strategize to make that happen.”

Wren said part of that strategy is linked to increased revenues the Braves expect to get from the move in 2017 to a planned new ballpark in Cobb County. The Braves’ payroll is expected to climb to about $100 million this season, from $90 million in 2013. It still will likely be just below the median major league payroll.

The Braves are counting on increased attendance and revenues at the new ballpark and its planned adjoining retail and entertainment village to help offset the relatively small amount they get from their local TV deal that’s well below other teams’ recent deals.

Link to full article: http://www.ajc.com/news/sports/baseball/wren-says-freeman-contract-first-big-step-in-brave/ndD5b/

It certainly sounds like they are going to at least attempt to keep Jason Heyward long term as well, and it wouldn't surprise me if they try to work out something with Teheran and Minor. Freeman may be the first dominoe to fall.
 
The issue with Jason is that every other year so far in his major league career, he's had significant injuries that have affected his production. It is easier to reach agreement in terms of valuing a player when that player is more consistent and durable like Freeman. I do think that at his best Heyward is more valuable than Freeman. If he has a season like his 2010 or 2012 seasons in 2014, I could see Heyward getting a bigger contract.
 
Back
Top