Definitely an outlier but there was a lot of talk around Pitt that he had made some significant adjustments. Who knows if that's all lip service. He had a higher BABIP but it wasn't absurd. His power numbers were crazy. Worth a $5 million gamble to be a super until guy or platoon mate if there was any truth to the adjustment narrative
I don't disagree that he is a good piece for a team.
I'm saying it was an odd move. Odd in the fact that they would spend for a premium bench piece ($5m qualifies as a premium bench player), but couldn't/wouldn't go 3/25 on a starting caliber catcher that would provide a 1-2 win improvement as well as 10-15 framing runs. They haven't improved 3b or C, where they are projected to be awful. They haven't added a RHed bench piece to use as a 4th OFer. Wouldn't you expect them to fill those holes before filling a hole that didn't really exist?
Signing a premium bench piece isn't something a team does after they failed to acquire an MLB average solution at C and 3b. It isn't a move that is going to hurt or help the team in any appreciable way, but it certainly is an odd move for a non-contender to make.
I don't disagree that he is a good piece for a team.
I'm saying it was an odd move. Odd in the fact that they would spend for a premium bench piece ($5m qualifies as a premium bench player), but couldn't/wouldn't go 3/25 on a starting caliber catcher that would provide a 1-2 win improvement as well as 10-15 framing runs. They haven't improved 3b or C, where they are projected to be awful. They haven't added a RHed bench piece to use as a 4th OFer. Wouldn't you expect them to fill those holes before filling a hole that didn't really exist?
Signing a premium bench piece isn't something a team does after they failed to acquire an MLB average solution at C and 3b. It isn't a move that is going to hurt or help the team in any appreciable way, but it certainly is an odd move for a non-contender to make.
At the end of the day I don't think it matters one way or the other.
Rodriguez/Peterson platoon at second.
Leaves room for a 4 man bench: KJ, Francoeur, Mallex, 2nd catcher
That's quite a bit of a reach IMO.
Very positive review of the signing from beyond the box score. And they are a saber slanted blog so that should make a lot of people on this board happy:
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2016/11/24/13743882/sean-rodriguez-atlanta-braves-free-agent-bargain
The point is why add a $5m per year bench player to a 75 win team? What is he insurance against? Losing 100 games?
It's like adding a new winch to a truck that will probably break down before it needs to pull anything with that winch.
Very positive review of the signing from beyond the box score. And they are a saber slanted blog so that should make a lot of people on this board happy:
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2016/11/24/13743882/sean-rodriguez-atlanta-braves-free-agent-bargain
Maybe they use a different projection system than you. Most of the ones I have seen are trash at projecting prospects to the majors. That's why we are only projected to win 75 games. If Dansby hadn't come up to the majors and showed he belonged he would be projected to be **** next year.
That's quite a bit of a reach IMO.
Actually, it's anything but Saber in this blog/analysis. It discusses the adjustments Rodriguez made with his lower body then demonstrates it with a couple of before-and-after .gifs. Then it measures the impact with a review of his stats. Some of the stats are advanced, but that's about as Saber as it goes.
Pretty sure they do. They're not behaving like a 75-win club this offseason.