Hometown discounts are about as rare as hometown bonuses. Are we sure the Braves didn't give him a hometown bonus?
We know that or sure? Being from Atl area had nothing to do with Nick's decision? We know what San Fran's offer was?
So if San Fran offered 4/40 it would be a good deal for them?
A handy BJ is bonus enough.
First they got Jenkins, but then they needed Markakis for those other two Ks.
Explain why this move "had to be made"?
aka Garrett Anderson
Gross.
They probably think they sold high on Heyward and bought low on Markakis.
Quality right fielder and a good bat. Also the huge hole the team had in right field.
His last 3 years disagree with you. And he only gets on base at a good clip compared to his new teammates.
Yeah, this is exactly what MFII was referring to earlier when he envisioned Hart and company giving each other high-fives and back-slaps as if they had just pulled off some massive coup.
So you wanted Wren fired for giving big contracts to BJ and Uggla, who were actually more valuable than Markakis, but signing a 31 year old to a 4 year contract with a contract like this is a good idea?
Dave is looking rough.
I stopped reading when you said BJ Upton was valuable. Uggla was at the time because he was a legit power hitting right handed batter.
In fairness to BJ, he nearly had a 30/30 season the year we signed him.
If we're looking broadly at the current market for outfielders in baseball then I believe a decent case can be made that the Braves signed Markakis at-value. Where I draw pause is at the question of whether or not this acquisition was ultimately necessary, given the team's position to contend in 2015. If Hart were to keep Justin Upton around Markakis would be a welcome addition at the top of the order and a palatable substitution for Heyward -- especially if you are choosing to accept the assertion that he was demanding $25MM from Atlanta.
However, seeing as how the Braves appear to have no real intention of keeping J. Upton we have to treat Markakis as an integral addition to the roster. And he just isn't - that's not an attack, just an honest assessment of the skills he brings to the table at this stage of his career. I accept that he will help unite the clubhouse and embody consistency across the board, but, again, at a real premium cost to an organization that is resource deficient.
This deal falls between the ass crack of those that wanted to rebuild, and those that wanted to reload. It pleases no one.
In fairness to BJ, he nearly had a 30/30 season the year we signed him.
Well you can choose that comparison. Not sure if I would.