Climate

Look guys, the world is gone in 12 years (said 3 years ago) if we don't give up all money and power to the government
 
Because many of the green movements are financially supported by Russia. Putin knows this crap is destructive to the West.

[tw]1617268918405722112[/tw]
 
Garmel said:
Because many of the green movements are financially supported by Russia. Putin knows this crap is destructive to the West.

[tw]1617268918405722112[/tw]
Click to expand...

CCP and Russia have played the idiot leftist like a fiddle.
 
The reason the leftists don't want nuclear as a solution is because it is in fact a solution.

Having a solution does not enable the massive transfer of power to the government, so we cannot have nuclear as an option
 
sturg33 said:
The reason the leftists don't want nuclear as a solution is because it is in fact a solution.

Having a solution does not enable the massive transfer of power to the government, so we cannot have nuclear as an option
Click to expand...

Yup - They don't actually care about anything other than power.
 
zitothebrave said:
It's well above freezing in the end of January. We;re in fact 4 degrees from a daily record high. While we're throwing out anecdotal evidence.
Click to expand...

I've in fact been lectured many times that hurricanes and strength of hurricanes is evidence of catastrophic climate change.

I'm happy to learn from zito that the opposite of that is simply anecdotal evidence
 
Tapate50 said:
Lol- sorry for partying ?
Click to expand...

LMFAO_-_Sorry_For_Party_Rocking.png
 
sturg33 said:
I've in fact been lectured many times that hurricanes and strength of hurricanes is evidence of catastrophic climate change.

I'm happy to learn from zito that the opposite of that is simply anecdotal evidence
Click to expand...

OK?

Be pragmatic, this is since 1980. Which isn't a massive window

I mean it was a soft hurricane season. So what? If next year it's a high you willing to accept it as an argument against you?
 
zitothebrave said:
OK?

Be pragmatic, this is since 1980. Which isn't a massive window

I mean it was a soft hurricane season. So what? If next year it's a high you willing to accept it as an argument against you?
Click to expand...

No I won't.

But I'm not the one making the claim that human activity is causing more and worse storms.

That's the climate cult people. Yet they seem unwilling to consider the opposite of that being anything meaningful in their conclusions
 
It was a sham movement to control human behavior. It’s like every single thing the left pretends to care about (as they still use their private jets)
 
they
/T͟Hā/
Learn to pronounce
pronoun
1.
used to refer to two or more people or things previously mentioned or easily identified.
"the two men could get life sentences if they are convicted"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top