#Cryptocrash

The saying on Wall Street is the real scandals are the things that are legal. There are significant parts of our financial system that largely amount to legalized theft.

My hope though is that Bankman-Fried crossed the line and will have the book thrown at him.
 
SBF has been in bed with regulators for years begging to be regulated while scamming the **** out of its customers and funneling money to the people who are now going to investigate him.

as I said, it will be telling to see what his punishment is



Is your position that politicians who benefitted from SBF’s donations *not* look further into the allegations against him? I’m guessing the guy didn’t walk up Maxine Waters and tell her he was channeling billions of dollars worth of assets out the back door. I’d be more concerned if the government didn’t want to check in on this.

We will see. But hard for me to believe the Dems will punish their top donor

Maybe you’re right. It seems like a ****ing political softball for them to go after a finance ghoul, though. “Blah, blah, blah, nobody is above the law, we’re here to protect you from billionaires, vote for us.”

He won't spend a day in jail because he has funded the tyranny

It is adorable how naive leftists are


[tw]1600614057920307209[/tw]
 
It is adorable how naive leftists are


[tw]1600614057920307209[/tw]


FjaHcYwWIAA73Or
 
No subpoena, yet Elon musk gets investigated for having beds in a Twitter office.

Someone you have zero morals, and it shows
 
I don't blame you guys for wanting him to testify while Maxine and the Dems are still in charge of the committee. In a couple more weeks the food fight starts. I hear Majorie Taylor Green plans to wear horns on her first day.

4wgygp.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't blame you guys for wanting him to testify while the Maxine and the Dems are still in charge of the committee. In a couple more weeks the food fight starts. I hear Majorie Taylor Green plans to wear horns on her first day.

4wgygp.jpg

Can you in your own words explain why you don't think he should be called in?
 
Can you in your own words explain why you don't think he should be called in?
Once again you prejudged me.

Can you in your own words explain why you think I even have an opinion on whether he should or should not be called in?

I really don't know anything about the situation. I thought the bitcoin crap was a scam from the start and don't need a congressional hearing. It does seem rather a waste of time this late in the year/term. Why not just call him into testify once the GOP is in charge in a couple more weeks?

I find it interesting that you guys think this is worthy of congressional testimony but think Jan 6 was nothing. Was it mostly MAGA gooberheads that were gullible enough to invest in bitcoin?
 
Once again you prejudged me.

Can you in your own words explain why you think I even have an opinion on whether he should or should not be called in?

I really don't know anything about the situation. I thought the bitcoin crap was a scam from the start and don't need a congressional hearing. It does seem rather a waste of time this late in the year/term. Why not just call him into testify once the GOP is in charge in a couple more weeks?

I find it interesting that you guys think this is worthy of congressional testimony but think Jan 6 was nothing. Was it mostly MAGA gooberheads that were gullible enough to invest in bitcoin?

A simple "no" would have sufficed
 
Back
Top