zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
I don't know if I agree that you shouldn't be able to change your mind.
I mean a lot of guys have changed their perception on pitchers because of statistics, Morris being a perfect example.
I think if people take a few years to recognize how good someone was by looking at their stats again, I think that's fine.
Biggio gets hurt because he was considered a compiler, but like jpx I agree that guys who last a long time in this game SHOULD get recognition. It shouldn't be about peak exclusively, as Pedro Martinez will be the perfect example of a peak starter without compiling huge numbers. Biggio compiled stats and was loyal he should be in. Helton will be hurt because of Coors, but the fact he was loyal to Colorado his entire career, and quietly put up very good numbers should be in consideration.
If you aren't voting for 10 guys I don't think you shoudl. What would make you change your mind on someone's eligibility 13 years later? I think you should have to ustify your picks, including why you think someone is eligible now but wasn't then. If you can't give a solid reason as for why you vote for someone and didn't as well, then you should be eliminated from the panel of voters.
Of course I agree with a writer (I think from Chicago) where they should just ditch the writers voting and the hall just elects people.