I'd at least kick the tires on Santana. I wouldn't offer anything big for him. I'm not a big fan of Garza. Hope Wren stays away from him.
I'd rather raise our offer to Hudson than dish out the kind of multi-year deal it would take to get Garza or Santana.
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/atl...md=20131028&content_id=63449274&vkey=news_atl
Nothing ground-breaking but worth posting.
Not that we NEED to make any huge moves.
Regards to Garza or Santana, it depends on the cost and if either come with draft pick stuff.
In order to receive Draft-pick compensation, clubs must make a qualifying offer to any of its qualifying free agents by 5 p.m. ET, five days after the completion of the World Series. The player has until 5 p.m. ET on the seventh day after receiving the offer to accept, which this year is a one-year contract valued at $14.1 million.
While the Braves will almost definitely make a qualifying offer to McCann with the understanding he would likely not accept it, they would almost certainly not make the offer to Hudson, who would have plenty of reason to accept and as a result possibly double his potential salary for next season.
No team is going to give up a draft pick to sign Tim Hudson for 2+ years.
As far as free agents go, this is not the year for the Braves to get into that market. Once you get past Cano, Ellsbury, Choo, and McCann, the market is kind of "meh". The Braves can't afford Cano and there is either no place or too expensive in regards to Ellsbury and Choo. McCann is going to get a big contract offer from an A.L. team, likely Rangers or Yankees. Other than that, unless you get a bullpen guy, no need to get a free agent. The big thing is see if you can get an ace through a trade and see what the Braves can do about Uggla.
This also could be a year in which one of the youngsters gets a long term contract. Whether that be Freeman, Heyward, Simmons, or Kimbrel, it's time to lock up at least one or two of those guys.
I do like the idea of picking up Eric Chavez.
Maybe a bench of Chavez, Laird, Pena, Reed Johnson and Schafer.
A qualifying offer for Hudson would not be crazy imo. It is a slight overpay but has the advantage of not committing the team to a multi-year deal.
Why do these hypothetical rosters keep getting posted with basically the same team? Don't think that the whole winter is going to consist of only:
1.) watching McCann walk
2.) dumping Uggla
3.) re-signing Hudson
If that were realistic, we might as well shut this forum down until ST, because there won't be anything to talk about.
Every year, no matter what, there is always significant roster turnover. Wren will sign somebody. He will make at least one trade. Some new faces will be in camp, and not just promotions from the minors.
One would think long time fans would be aware of this. Every year shows 6-10 new faces come out of ST.Why do these hypothetical rosters keep getting posted with basically the same team? Don't think that the whole winter is going to consist of only:
1.) watching McCann walk
2.) dumping Uggla
3.) re-signing Hudson
If that were realistic, we might as well shut this forum down until ST, because there won't be anything to talk about.
Every year, no matter what, there is always significant roster turnover. Wren will sign somebody. He will make at least one trade. Some new faces will be in camp, and not just promotions from the minors.
Why do these hypothetical rosters keep getting posted with basically the same team? Don't think that the whole winter is going to consist of only:
1.) watching McCann walk
2.) dumping Uggla
3.) re-signing Hudson
If that were realistic, we might as well shut this forum down until ST, because there won't be anything to talk about.
Every year, no matter what, there is always significant roster turnover. Wren will sign somebody. He will make at least one trade. Some new faces will be in camp, and not just promotions from the minors.