Donaldson and Pandora’s Box

BeanieAntics said:
Who? Noll? Kieboom?

Noll is pretty uninspiring and if Kieboom plays 3rd then it leaves pretty uninspiring options at either 2nd or 1st, depending on where they play Kendrick. I'm no huge fan of Riley or Camargo starting at 3rd base, but I'd take them over Noll or whoever else the Nats have for 3rd base.
Click to expand...

Kaboom is a better prospect over Riley. Sure this year could be patch work but going forward kaboom is a legit player. If he pans out it could be that he is better than Josh in year 3 and 4 of the deal. I am simply saying that keeping J from the gnats is not a viable reason to sign him with an overpay
 
Boom is a potential impact bat who is already projected to produce 2-3 wins in his rookie season at 3b. The Nats also have Kendrick on board to play 3b/2b, and he is pretty much a lock for 2-3 wins.

They can patch together some sort of cheap 2 win platoon at 1b if they miss out on JD. They can also acquire a bat at 3b, 2b or 1b due to the versatility of guys like Boom and Kendrick. They did a good job replacing Harper with Soto, and will probably do a good job again replacing Rendon with Boom.

The Braves pretty much need JD, Bryant, or a massive downgrade at 3b from 2019. They have painted themselves into a spot where the only place to add an impact bat easily is at 3b. The Braves backup plans to pair with Camargo vanished when Mous and Shaw were signed.
 
Last edited:
Enscheff said:
Boom is a potential impact bat who is already projected to produce 2-3 wins in his rookie season at 3b. The Nats also have Kendrick on board to play 3b/2b, and he is pretty much a lock for 2-3 wins.

They can patch together some sort of cheap 2 win platoon at 1b if they miss out on JD. They can also acquire a bat at 3b, 2b or 1b due to the versatility of guys like Boom and Kendrick. They did a good job replacing Harper with Soto, and will probably do a good job again replacing Rendon with Boom.

The Braves pretty much need JD, Bryant, or a massive downgrade at 3b from 2019. They have painted themselves into a spot where the only place to add an impact bat easily is at 3b. The Braves backup plans to pair with Camargo vanished when Mous and Shaw were signed.
Click to expand...

This is why I changed my opinion. We now either pay a little more than what JD is worth or ALOT more in prospects.

I’m all for us making a trade from pitching depth, but not from our top position players. I get a sick feeling about trading Pache or Waters. Last time I had that feeling was the HO trade.
 
Yeah Nats have some options. Kieboom, maybe trade for Seager, Kendrick can play all over. And they still have a front 3 of Corbin/Stras/Max which is as good as anyone has in baseball.

Their bullpen is a bigger concern to me than 3B. You can get away with only using Doo, Hudson, and one of your SP's in the playoffs as a RP, but not through 162. Braves are in a bigger mess if they dont keep JD, because there's not many options to fill the 3B slot unless AA surprises and gets Arenado.
 
blueagleace1 said:
I'm all aboard giving JD a 4th year if that's what it takes but IF we do lose out on him I keep coming back to one team and trade that could/would solve our issues...

Trading for Seager and Haniger would give us what we need and I don't think would cost as much as Bryant or Arenado.
Click to expand...

I think Seager could be Plan C after JD and KB.

He is owed 3/52 if traded, and is projected to be something between Shaw and Mous...both of whom were fallback options to pair with Camargo. He carries negative surplus value, so the Ms would have to kick in cash or add a prospect just to move him.

Haniger has 3 years of arb remaining, and would fit nicely as a cOF on this roster. Adding him to Seager would lower the prospect package needed to acquire him by a good bit.

Seager for 3 years isn’t a great spot to be in, but buying low on Haniger would be nice.

Seager and Haniger plus cash for Riley and an arm could make sense for both teams. Of course, I’m the low man on Riley, so I’m looking to cash him in for anything of value from any team dumb enough to do it.
 
Last edited:
Enscheff said:
I think Seager could be Plan C after JD and KB.

He is owed 3/52 if traded, and is projected to be something between Shaw and Mous...both of whom were fallback options to pair with Camargo. He carries negative surplus value, so the Ms would have to kick in cash or add a prospect just to move him.

Haniger has 3 years of arb remaining, and would fit nicely as a cOF on this roster. Adding him to Seager would lower the prospect package needed to acquire him by a good bit.

Seager for 3 years isn’t a great spot to be in, but buying low on Haniger would be nice.

Seager and Haniger plus cash for Riley and an arm could make sense for both teams. Of course, I’m the low man on Riley, so I’m looking to cash him in for anything of value from any team dumb enough to do it.
Click to expand...

That was my thinking too, Seager would just be a means of acquiring Haniger without giving up our big 3. I actually think a Wilson/Camargo/Inciarte for Seager/Haniger makes sense for both teams. Could also expand the deal to include Mallex if you didn't feel comfortable with Acuna and Haniger manning CF until Pache is ready.
 
Seagar comes out better in the expected metrics.

That's not the worst solution and certainly pairing him with Haniger would upgrade two spots assuming health for both.

I don't think 19m/18m/15m is so bad, and maybe you could get him to waive the conversion of the third year.

I think it's certainly a more risky play than Bryant or Arenado in terms of him actually contributing in the present though. Same with Haniger.
 
blueagleace1 said:
That was my thinking too, Seager would just be a means of acquiring Haniger without giving up our big 3. I actually think a Wilson/Camargo/Inciarte for Seager/Haniger makes sense for both teams. Could also expand the deal to include Mallex if you didn't feel comfortable with Acuna and Haniger manning CF until Pache is ready.
Click to expand...

This is the best trade scenario to me.


If they JD is asking for a 5TH year for big money...that definitely changes things.
 
Enscheff said:
5 years for JD? $125M?

At some point AA has to admit he misjudged the market for JD and move on to a Plan B.
Click to expand...

It sucks but they may need to before the fallback options are no longer there.

But I think he, along with a few players, misjudged the amount of money flowing this offseason. He did good to get Hamels when he did, IMO.
 
There are a number of fallback options for third. None as good as Donaldson. But that's why they are called fallback options.
 
Enscheff said:
5 years for JD? $125M?

At some point AA has to admit he misjudged the market for JD and move on to a Plan B.
Click to expand...

Would that be akin to getting out of Donaldson's barrel,??

Put the lid back on the barrel and move on to a realistic move to fix the power bat needed and get Markakis/Duval platoon out of Snit's grasp.
 
Not sure JD gets a contract with a 5th year option but if he does, god bless his agent. Even 4 seems risky, even with the DH likely coming to the NL.
 
nsacpi said:
There are a number of fallback options for third. None as good as Donaldson. But that's why they are called fallback options.
Click to expand...

Needs to decide something soon regardless - his slow decision is keeping me from pulling the trigger on moves to pick up Camargo and Riley in a fantasy league.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top