zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Explain this difference to me - not from a legality standpoint, but from a practical standpoint.
Situation a:
Political candidate campaigns on cutting spending. Gets elected. Once elected, decides to change course and get taxes raised in an effort to provide additional foodstamp benefits for poor individuals. Taxes get raised on each individual on a net $200 a year. Food stamp benefits increase for poor individuals.
Situation b:
Person puts a gun in a rich guy's face and demands his money. Rich guy gives him $200. Person takes that $200 and gives it to the local homeless person to buy food.
Made me lol
You can always leave the country, or state, or town if you disagree with the tax policy. But there's a reason that the rich white folk don't flock to UAE, Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain, etc. Because they love western luxuries, like cell towers, internet, highways, so on so forth that are made possible partially or entirely by taxes. If you disagree with the US tax code you're free to leave. But good luck over there.
Irony of course is that nearly all those countries I list that don't have income tax still have some form of social security which you consider robbery.