nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
The question of trade and openness to trade and ideas and their connection to growth is one of the most important in economics. There is a tricky statistical issue having to do with endogeneity. But most of the evidence points in the direction of a positive causal relationship between openness to trade and growth.
China btw is a noteworthy recent case study. Their economic takeoff coincided with their opening to the rest of the world in the late 1970s. The UK is another recent case study, with its economy under-performing other advanced economies since Brexit. North and South Korea fall in the genre of interesting twin studies: one very closed one very open.
To the extent there is a seminal paper in the field, it would probably be Jeffrey Frenkel and David Romer's 1999 paper in the American Economic Review: "Does Trade Cause Growth?" It showed the way for trying to deal with the endogeneity problem.
China btw is a noteworthy recent case study. Their economic takeoff coincided with their opening to the rest of the world in the late 1970s. The UK is another recent case study, with its economy under-performing other advanced economies since Brexit. North and South Korea fall in the genre of interesting twin studies: one very closed one very open.
To the extent there is a seminal paper in the field, it would probably be Jeffrey Frenkel and David Romer's 1999 paper in the American Economic Review: "Does Trade Cause Growth?" It showed the way for trying to deal with the endogeneity problem.
Last edited by a moderator: