Gaetz

Yeah, I know, nothings an audit unless it finds your desired result. I understood that a long time ago.

No. A full forensic audit involves EVERYTHING. Ballots, voter rolls, machine analysis, etc.. That's why it's so expensive. Do yourself a favor so when you don't know what you're talking about just quit talking so you won't embarrass yourself.
 
Last edited:

No, they're calling it a forensic audit when it's just a simple audit. Full forensic audit involves a full look into the machines, not just accuracy checking. It also involves a thorough analysis of the ballots, not just sampling. The difference between this audit and the AZ's was that every single ballot was looked at and examined under a microscope in AZ The machines were examined head to toe. The accuracy checking of the Texas audit would not have picked up that the election database was missing in AZ.

This is the difference between knowledge of the subject and someone who just plunks an article from the web.
 
Wait, are you saying the Arizona audit was a forensic audit you wanted? And the electi9on database was not missing or deleted. That was a hoax. And I dont see anywhere where the Texas audit is said to have been a sampling. They audited the two biggest Democratic counties. Which if you are alleging fraud by Democrats is the best place to find it.
 
Last edited:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/el...on-audit-backtracks-deleted-database-n1267900


Nah man, I just have the auditors who said it was deleted saying they have it and it wasnt deleted.

The whole article is BS, dude. The auditors found them and they were deleted. Do you want me to show you what Maricopa said under oath at a committee hearing? Here we go 1) they admitted the files were deleted off the machines. They try the "we archived it" route to another machine but never turned that one over. 2) they said they did it because they needed more room on the hardrive so they deleted the 2020 election database but not the old ones from 2018 and 2016. What sense does that make? Let me remind you that the machines were under subpoena and should not have been touched in the first place.

Here's the video to prove I'm correct.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4981...county-admits-deleted-files-archived-subpoena
 
Last edited:


Deleted from the voting machines and archived. Not deleted from existence. This video has the literal head of the auditors admitting they got the files. Just accept it dude, you fell for the hoax, happens to the best of us.


and for the record since I know you are slow, I dont consider someone misremembering a fact is falling for a hoax. Just going by the standard you want to use.
 
Last edited:


Deleted from the voting machines and archived. Not deleted from existence. This video has the literal head of the auditors admitting they got the files. Just accept it dude, you fell for the hoax, happens to the best of us.

Holy ****. They did not admit they got some of the files except through rebuilding the database. Do I need to show you the full clip from the auditors and not a cherry picked video meant to deceive? They had to rebuild the data because it was all removed from their machines.
 
Last edited:
So to recap, the auditors got what they needed and there was no evidence of any fraud in that data. Any part of that you dispute?
 
Will be fun to follow this race just to laugh at you when the outcome is clear.

Y'all sure do love your rapists and pedos. I get it. The see-no-evil wing is in the ascendancy.

But hey the good people of North Carolina dumped Madison Cawthorn. Hope springs eternal.
 
Y'all sure do love your rapists and pedos. I get it. The see-no-evil wing is in the ascendancy.

But hey the good people of North Carolina dumped Madison Cawthorn. Hope springs eternal.

I thought court cases are the defining event on these types of things.

I guess not?
 
Back
Top