GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
zbhargrove said:
Yes, the print out goes straight to the voter to turn in. If the machine changed their vote, you think they wouldn't have told anyone? Yet we are still where we were when you started this crap... zero actual evidence.
Click to expand...

Exactly. If there was some sort of mass fraud, a lot of people would have noticed that their votes had changed. And it would be pretty risky (and dumb) for anyone to risk doing such a scam and think several thousand people people would not notice when they turned in their ballots.
 
thethe said:
Please allow me to correct the above statement as I’m too giddy to function lately.

[tw]1328409185017614336[/tw]
Click to expand...

This is the type of **** that you are going to court with and is why judges are laughing and throwing it out lol
 
thethe said:
Am I reading this right that they used a printout from the voting machines to match the machine talleyed counts?
Click to expand...

Meaningful machine fraud would have to occur in the numbers the machine reports, they would have to be logged correctly at the time the ballot was submitted and then changed between that point and the point that the totals are reported. A hand count would show the difference and prove the machine fraud, if it existed.
 
Jaw said:
Meaningful machine fraud would have to occur in the numbers the machine reports, they would have to be logged correctly at the time the ballot was submitted and then changed between that point and the point that the totals are reported. A hand count would show the difference and prove the machine fraud, if it existed.
Click to expand...

Its quite basic for most people to understand.
 
Jaw said:
Meaningful machine fraud would have to occur in the numbers the machine reports, they would have to be logged correctly at the time the ballot was submitted and then changed between that point and the point that the totals are reported. A hand count would show the difference and prove the machine fraud, if it existed.
Click to expand...

This is the whole premise of the argument being made though.
 
zbhargrove said:
Yes, the print out goes straight to the voter to turn in. If the machine changed their vote, you think they wouldn't have told anyone? Yet we are still where we were when you started this crap... zero actual evidence.
Click to expand...

You should listen to the argument being made on what the voting software did
 
thethe said:
This is the whole premise of the argument being made though.
Click to expand...

Voter votes on machine... machine prints out ballot. Voter checks to make sure what they put in machine matches how they voted. Voter turns vote in. Print outs are cross referenced with computer count. So thousands of print outs are magically altered with what? Sharpies? New printers? Are you that dumb?
 
zbhargrove said:
Voter votes on machine... machine prints out ballot. Voter checks to make sure what they put in machine matches how they voted. Voter turns vote in. Print outs are cross referenced with computer count. So thousands of print outs are magically altered with what? Sharpies? New printers? Are you that dumb?
Click to expand...

If you paid attention and was curious at all about what the argument is then you would know that the votes would be changed after the vote is registered in the system or else it would be the worst scam of all time.

So the point remains that without an audit to validate the current vote record in the system matches what the voter selected the recount is just a validation of the fraud.
 
You’re arguing it could happen


Not that it did


Thus why you keep losing in court and can’t orove any of the accusations
 
thethe said:
If you paid attention and was curious at all about what the argument is then you would know that the votes would be changed after the vote is registered in the system or else it would be the worst scam of all time.

So the point remains that without an audit to validate the current vote record in the system matches what the voter selected the recount is just a validation of the fraud.
Click to expand...

But the printouts are matching what was in the system. So I guess somehow those bad Dems changed hundreds of thousands of votes (or to you... millions since you're making the idiotic claim that Trump won the popular vote) in the machines and then also magically made new print outs too. Do you even realize how ridiculous and impossible that would be?
 
thethe's practice... if its even rumored on a conservative website or Tweet its 100% true and cannot be argued... even if no concrete evidence is true. Yet, if you give him concrete evidence against Trump it can't be believed... I mean... you actually think you're not partisan dude? Are you crazy? This is like Scientology level of misinformation.
 
zbhargrove said:
But the printouts are matching what was in the system. So I guess somehow those bad Dems changed hundreds of thousands of votes (or to you... millions since you're making the idiotic claim that Trump won the popular vote) in the machines and then also magically made new print outs too. Do you even realize how ridiculous and impossible that would be?
Click to expand...

You could always read Dominions own information to know that that was a feature of the software.
 
zbhargrove said:
thethe's practice... if its even rumored on a conservative website or Tweet its 100% true and cannot be argued... even if no concrete evidence is true. Yet, if you give him concrete evidence against Trump it can't be believed... I mean... you actually think you're not partisan dude? Are you crazy? This is like Scientology level of misinformation.
Click to expand...

When have an ever said I wasn’t partisan?
 
zbhargrove said:
thethe's practice... if its even rumored on a conservative website or Tweet its 100% true and cannot be argued... even if no concrete evidence is true. Yet, if you give him concrete evidence against Trump it can't be believed... I mean... you actually think you're not partisan dude? Are you crazy? This is like Scientology level of misinformation.
Click to expand...

or Seth Rich

or pizzagate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top