GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
24025537.gif

no, i think i got your point

i think it's a bad point

cause how could they have censored it or put a tag on your examples/point if said policy wasn't happening yet?

but you can break it down for me more if you think i'm still missing, imo, the bad point you were trying to make

there is still a better chance a pee tape is out there than election fraud in the usa though ftr
 
The only people who seem to know what qanon says are leftists

your obsession to reply with that instead of acknowledging it's a thing and followed by a decent amount of people in the circles you run with is well noted
 
no, i think i got your point

i think it's a bad point

cause how could they have censored it or put a tag on your examples/point if said policy wasn't happening yet?

but you can break it down for me more if you think i'm still missing, imo, the bad point you were trying to make

there is still a better chance a pee tape is out there than election fraud in the usa though ftr

There wasn't a need to censor nationally prominent misinformation when it benefited Democrats.
 
Then repeating it verbatim is some weird improbable ****! But you know what they say about giving a monkey enough time at a keyboard/typewriter.

it's like by the rules of infinite probability

at some point, i should open my dryer and all my clothes should be folded already
 
no, i think i got your point

i think it's a bad point

cause how could they have censored it or put a tag on your examples/point if said policy wasn't happening yet?

but you can break it down for me more if you think i'm still missing, imo, the bad point you were trying to make

there is still a better chance a pee tape is out there than election fraud in the usa though ftr

Weirdly they didn't censor the hacked NYT tax returns of Trump.

So so so weird
 
There wasn't a need to censor nationally prominent misinformation when it benefited Democrats.

uh, ok

i feel this is a weird hill to die on

it's like many other examples of improvement of anything and people getting angry of "in the past, this wasn't done or an option" etc

they saw that the lies, fake news and misinformation were bad and did terrible things and decided to combat it

that a policy wasn't a thing back then and ask why said policy wasn't implemented when said policy didn't exist is silly
 
Likewise I think 90% oann tv audience is you and cajun rage watching it.

Its hilarious


i couldn't even tell you if that **** is on a regular tv. any example i see is from twitter or elsewhere that brings their insanity to light to show you how far gone the maga cult has gone

but facts about me have never been your strong suit

so, keep flinging and one day you'll land with your obsession with me.
 
uh, ok

i feel this is a weird hill to die on

it's like many other examples of improvement of anything and people getting angry of "in the past, this wasn't done or an option" etc

they saw that the lies, fake news and misinformation were bad and did terrible things and decided to combat it

that a policy wasn't a thing back then and ask why said policy wasn't implemented when said policy didn't exist is silly

Sure, sure. I'm certain that it's only a coincidence that the misinformation policy applied to every recount and fraud post now wasn't in place while the sordid and fake details of Steele were flying around. And the same must be true of the hacking policy that applies to Hunter's laptop but not to our President's tax returns. Completely coincidental. Just one of those fluke things.
 
I hate censorship. It ****ing sucks. I do not think having a warning or fact check attached to something is censorship.
 
the ny post story wasn't journalism lol

What i know for certain is that you can't and won't explain why.

But please just have the self awareness that you were supportive of censorship for one side, but not the other, even though they both broke the same policy
 
Likewise I think 90% oann tv audience is you and cajun rage watching it.

Its hilarious


I dont know where you get the rage part from. I like watching all sides to see whats going on. Been watching mostly Newsmax, Charlie Kirk, and Crowder since the election. Its comedy gold.
 
fox news even passed on it after looking at the story from a journalistic side

ny post is a tabloid rag of right wing bs most of the time

lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top