GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
thethe said:
Oh and btw PA violated state statues in destroying ballot envelopes. Wonder why they did that when they knew it was illegal?

Answer isn’t too hard guys. I believe in you!
Click to expand...

220px-Clown_chili_peppers.jpg
 
thethe said:
When Obama won in 2012 he lost 4m votes from his 2008 win.

Trump GAINED 10m voters.

We aren’t going away.
Click to expand...


Obama won by so many votes he could lose 4 million votes and still win reelection. Trump had to add 10 million voters just to lose by 5 million votes....... after losing by 3 million votes the first time..... and never actually winning the popular vote.
 
thethe said:
Oh and btw PA violated state statues in destroying ballot envelopes. Wonder why they did that when they knew it was illegal?

Answer isn’t too hard guys. I believe in you!
Click to expand...

Show me the law. Don't show me a tweet by a Trumptard. Show me the law. I want the PA Statute that says it. Not some hearsay you heard while jacking off to Trump jacking off to Ivanka.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Obama won by so many votes he could lose 4 million votes and still win reelection. Trump had to add 10 million voters just to lose by 5 million votes....... after losing by 3 million votes the first time..... and never actually winning the popular vote.
Click to expand...

Right, Obama didn't have to try in 2012. Mitt was ran not to win but to get corporate interests back into the Republican party and refill their coffers. IIRC 2012 was also a pretty weak Senate year. You could argue Obama not trying hard cost them the House, but that was the race the Rs were running for anyway.
 
The affidavits being submitted as evidence in a Michigan lawsuit are detailed in this thread. I'm not sure what possible resolution there is even if some of it can be proven.
[tw]1326976847792508936[/tw]
 
Jaw said:
The affidavits being submitted as evidence in a Michigan lawsuit are detailed in this thread. I'm not sure what possible resolution there is even if some of it can be proven.
[tw]1326976847792508936[/tw]
Click to expand...

This thread reads of stretching. Check it out though.

Personally there should be heavy heavy penalties for whomever is lying. If we find out that these poll watchers were doing illegal things or lying, they should face the consequences. From what I've heard the watchers in michigan were being royal jaggoffs to poll workers. Cause i can counter this lawsuit with

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...s-detroit-poll-challenger-gop-came-make-havoc

Keep in mind, I don't think this person is an expert. But it mimics other accounts I've read. Basically GOP poll watchers and challengers being dicks about everything. Which probably lead to all the ejections because according to Michigan Law disorderly conduct is charge for removal.
 
zitothebrave said:
This thread reads of stretching. Check it out though.

Personally there should be heavy heavy penalties for whomever is lying. If we find out that these poll watchers were doing illegal things or lying, they should face the consequences. From what I've heard the watchers in michigan were being royal jaggoffs to poll workers. Cause i can counter this lawsuit with

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...s-detroit-poll-challenger-gop-came-make-havoc

Keep in mind, I don't think this person is an expert. But it mimics other accounts I've read. Basically GOP poll watchers and challengers being dicks about everything. Which probably lead to all the ejections because according to Michigan Law disorderly conduct is charge for removal.
Click to expand...

They seemed like the kind of claims you can make without being proven a liar, and without really accomplishing much besides casting doubt. The lawsuits have been theatre so far.
 
Ari Berman
@AriBerman
·
9h
There have been more Trump aides who’ve tested positive

for coronavirus since the election than documented cases of voter fraud
 
Jaw said:
The affidavits being submitted as evidence in a Michigan lawsuit are detailed in this thread. I'm not sure what possible resolution there is even if some of it can be proven.
[tw]1326976847792508936[/tw]
Click to expand...


They have no case to begin with. There is no chance the courts would disenfranchise voters because they dont like how they were processed.
 
Republicans hate voters

Their plans have always been to make sure it’s hard as **** to vote

And if they didn’t get you to not vote

Their next step is to not count/throw out that vote
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top