GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
thethe said:
An auditor would never say Biden lost. They would assign a confidence level based on evidence they have. 11% false acceptance rate is way too large to definitively said who won.
Click to expand...

thethe said:
I understand why you are confused. The population to extrapolate the 11% error rate would be the total number of mail in ballots that were accepted as votes in Arizona. That number would be more than the margin of victory in Arizona.
Click to expand...

Only if you continue to ignore that all 11% were still considered legal ballots by Arizona law.
 
thethe said:
I understand why you are confused. The population to extrapolate the 11% error rate would be the total number of mail in ballots that were accepted as votes in Arizona. That number would be more than the margin of victory in Arizona.
Click to expand...

The margin of victory in Arizona is irrelevant here. By your logic, we shouldn’t worry about such things, and should instead use an arbitrary set of data to elect. I propose we choose between Trump and Biden based on the number of years served as Vice President.
 
Dalyn said:
Let's talk about a few things that thethe hasn't been adding to his posts. The 3% number with the first 100 duplicate ballots? When 1526 were reviewed after the first 100, 9 total ballots were discovered having an issue. 9. That includes the 3 found in the first 100. So that is 9 out of a total of 1626. All mistakes reported were fixed.

Now let's talk about the 11% number he keeps throwing around lately. Of the 11 out of 100 found inconclusive, there was no reason found to reject them. They were still legal ballots. All of them had the required matching phone number included, which is the fallback option for verifying an inconclusive signature. Over 20k people were contacted to verify.
Click to expand...

The 20k number sampled was off of a subset of the total population so I’d suggest you be careful on making a conclusion means on the .25% rejection rate on those.

In addition having publicly available information as corroboration for identification is laughable.

Also, I referenced the duplicate ballot test before anyone here and reference the results were immaterial to infer that alone should overturn the results. Important thing to note from an auditors perspective is that there is no materiality threshold on fraud.
 
mqt said:
The margin of victory in Arizona is irrelevant here. By your logic, we shouldn’t worry about such things, and should instead use an arbitrary set of data to elect. I propose we choose between Trump and Biden based on the number of years served as Vice President.
Click to expand...

Each state needs to make a decision based on evidence. Once AZ/GA/PA/MI/WI/NV withhold their electoral votes the election goes to the house
 
mqt said:
The margin of victory in Arizona is irrelevant here. By your logic, we shouldn’t worry about such things, and should instead use an arbitrary set of data to elect. I propose we choose between Trump and Biden based on the number of years served as Vice President.
Click to expand...

how about number of years spent living off daddy's money...that seems more fair to me
 
Dalyn said:
Only if you continue to ignore that all 11% were still considered legal ballots by Arizona law.
Click to expand...

You are in my opinion misinterpreting that line in the judgement.

They weren’t talking about the ballots being against Arizona law. Just the process performed.
 
thethe said:
In addition having publicly available information as corroboration for identification is laughable.
Click to expand...

It's the law. It's how it works. You don't get to challenge it after the fact because you don't like the results. That's why the courts threw it out just like all the rest. Even the dude from your side (who found only 6% inconclusive, another number you've chosen to ignore) said that there was no evidence of fraud or any reason whatsoever to reject any of the ballots.
 
thethe said:
You are in my opinion misinterpreting that line in the judgement.

They weren’t talking about the ballots being against Arizona law. Just the process performed.
Click to expand...

The important factor (for those of us not trying to steal an election) is whether or not they were legal ballots. They were.
 
thethe said:
You are in my opinion misinterpreting that line in the judgement.

They weren’t talking about the ballots being against Arizona law. Just the process performed.
Click to expand...

I believe the process being performed was determining whether or not the ballots were legally countable.
 
nsacpi said:
from a different thread:

"Goldy wants the magic money tree to give free money to every business owner in the country for years and years to avoid a scary virus with an obscenely high survival rate"

This contains several objectively false assertions.

You do stuff like this all the time. Make objectively false assertions of other people's positions. Bad faith argumentation is the only way to describe it.
Click to expand...

Goldy said he wants to pay these business owners so they can remain closed.

What is false about my post? Orher than there is not literally a money tree
 
goldfly said:
Freedom boy, I went out of my way and made this whole clip in like 30 seconds. I can do this for any person on twitter if you would like so you know if I follow em

I mean, I haven’t gotten out of bed yet so this is really easy to do

Click to expand...

I didn't watch
 
sturg33 said:
Goldy said he wants to pay these business owners so they can remain closed.

What is false about my post? Orher than there is not literally a money tree
Click to expand...

I see you have omitted EVERY and YEARS AND YEARS from your response

but let's ask Goldy if any of it is accurate
 
thethe said:
The 20k number sampled was off of a subset of the total population so I’d suggest you be careful on making a conclusion means on the .25% rejection rate on those.
Click to expand...

Not even the 20k I am talking about. Did you read the FULL judgment?

"Approximately 1.9 million mail-in ballots were cast and, of these, approximately 20,000 were identified that required contacting the voter. Of those, only 587 ultimately could not be validated."
 
sturg33 said:
Sure



I've asked him in the past for specifics but shockingly, he was very light on those and unwilling to provide
Click to expand...

still looking for where he argued for EVERY business in the country being paid for YEARS AND YEARS for being affected...it is bad faith argumentation...plain and simple...have a modicum of class and own it
 
thethe said:
[tw]1335557576587665408[/tw]

Mind if I say BIG [if true]?
Click to expand...

Of course if you keep reading the thread you see this... seems to be the case for all of your "evidence"... friend of a friend heard from their dog... can't be confirmed stuff:

[TW]1335650069094264839[/TW]
 
nsacpi said:
still looking for where he argued for EVERY business in the country being paid for YEARS AND YEARS for being affected...it is bad faith argumentation...plain and simple...have a modicum of class and own it
Click to expand...

Why would goldy support not all businesses being able to avoid losing their livelihood? Pretty heartless of you to assume gomdy would be OK with that.
 
thethe said:
Each state needs to make a decision based on evidence. Once AZ/GA/PA/MI/WI/NV withhold their electoral votes the election goes to the house
Click to expand...

I like the strategy has gone from let’s try to not count Biden votes

To

**** voting and the votes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top