GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember that time everyone mocked the thought that dominion voting machines were compromised?

Fun times.
 
Dems have been telling me that for the last 3 years. I think there's an HBO documentary coming out on it shortly

They oddly stopped thinking foreign interference in elections was an issue this year. Is that because they directly procured it from their CCP masters?

Anyone here want t dare discuss the findings of the forensic audit report or just pretend they never endlessly mocked the idea that DVS was fully compromised?
 
They oddly stopped thinking foreign interference in elections was an issue this year. Is that because they directly procured it from their CCP masters?

Anyone here want t dare discuss the findings of the forensic audit report or just pretend they never endlessly mocked the idea that DVS was fully compromised?

I saw it being discussed plenty here yesterday and you continue to be mock worthy.
 
Read. Don’t wait for someone to tell you what’s real or not.

You missed the sarcasm... I actually read more than tweets and headlines (unlike you)... I do know that you're going to be whining about a Joe Biden presidency for the next 4 years. I'm really sad for you.
 
You missed the sarcasm... I actually read more than tweets and headlines (unlike you)... I do know that you're going to be whining about a Joe Biden presidency for the next 4 years. I'm really sad for you.

I’m guessing you’ll stay away from the forensic report until someone else tweets about it.

Fitting.
 
I’m guessing you’ll stay away from the forensic report until someone else tweets about it.

Fitting.

Yes, the report signed off by a proven partisan hack who confused Michigan and Minnesota counties in an official analysis... this was all highlighted very clearly yesterday and you refuse to acknowledge the real truth about the report. More garbage... all of your evidence has been unprovable garbage from questionable sources. You know this.
 
This is the guy who signed off on the report... I mean, you can't be any dumber than duhduh if you just blindly believe the garbage being produced by the guy or anything associated with him. He's been consistently wrong about everything he's been babbling about so, let's just believe him now:

"The report is signed by Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Operations Group.

Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%."

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/michigan-company-officials-dispute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/
 
Yes, the report signed off by a proven partisan hack who confused Michigan and Minnesota counties in an official analysis... this was all highlighted very clearly yesterday and you refuse to acknowledge the real truth about the report. More garbage... all of your evidence has been unprovable garbage from questionable sources. You know this.

So again. Not discussing the report.

There is a reason for that.
 
So again. Not discussing the report.

There is a reason for that.

I mean, bipartisan election officials have said the report is garbage and Dominion has come out with a similar statement and official from Dominion is supposed to testify today... I don't understand why it should be discussed when the source of the report has been wrong with everything else and is a clear partisan hack. If you want to keep blindly following documented sketchy sources, you'll be able to convince yourself of anything. You're a lost cause and its pretty sad.

All misdirection because you don't want to discuss how awful your sources are.
 
Yes, the report signed off by a proven partisan hack who confused Michigan and Minnesota counties in an official analysis... this was all highlighted very clearly yesterday and you refuse to acknowledge the real truth about the report. More garbage... all of your evidence has been unprovable garbage from questionable sources. You know this.

Didn't they also claim Dominion machines were compromised in counties that didn't even use dominion voting macghines? Lol, this whole thing has been handled laughably bad.
 
I mean, bipartisan election officials have said the report is garbage and Dominion has come out with a similar statement and official from Dominion is supposed to testify today... I don't understand why it should be discussed when the source of the report has been wrong with everything else and is a clear partisan hack. If you want to keep blindly following documented sketchy sources, you'll be able to convince yourself of anything. You're a lost cause and its pretty sad.

What happened to the security logs?

What happened with the adjudication logs?

Why was the error rate exponentially higher than the FEC allowable limit?

Why was there capability to connect to t he internet?

Why did someone try to delete the records?

You guys are such sheep it’s sad.
 
Didn't they also claim Dominion machines were compromised in counties that didn't even use dominion voting macghines? Lol, this whole thing has been handled laughably bad.

Yes the original filing wanted votes thrown out because of Dominion machines in counties that had zero dominion machines.
 
What happened to the security logs?

What happened with the adjudication logs?

Why was the error rate exponentially higher than the FEC allowable limit?

Why was there capability to connect to t he internet?

Why did someone try to delete the records?

You guys are such sheep it’s sad.

More misdirection asking more questions about stuff that may or may not have happened that have not been proven at all.
 
More misdirection asking more questions about stuff that may or may not have happened that have not been proven at all.

What do you mean may or may not have happened. The logs are gone. That is a fact. The error rate is a recalculation based on actual testing. This is a fact.

What are you saying is not true?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top