GDT: 11/3/20, Election Day, Donald J. Trump vs. Joseph R. Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lin Wood's a dude... and has been on Trump's personal legal team in the past. He also say Epstein is alive and we'll be hearing from him soon.

By the way... Lin Wood was one of the major sources thethe used for his most outlandish claims

By all accounts he was a good attorney. He's certainly made a boatload of money. He seems to have had a mental break. I'm wondering if he has a fondness for 18th century hats or something.
 
This has put me in a great mood.

"These groups aspire to the goals of Communism. A ruling elite & an oppressed class of people who exist to serve those in power.

We have also learned that the Globalists like George Soros & the Elitists like Bill Gates were involved. CIA too (no surprise - military industrial complex).

For two months we have focused on accusing the Democrats of attempting to steal the 20/20 election for Biden. We focused on the Presidential election.

We focused on the obvious.

It all seemed so clear we overlooked one of the main participants in the theft of the election:

THE REPUBLICANS.


Over time, we have learned that the Democrats were joined by CCP & other foreign countries.

When arrests for treason begin, put Chief Justice John Roberts, VP Mike Pence @VP @Mike_Pence, & Mitch McConnell @senatemajldr at top of list."

- Lin Wood, lawyer for criminal President, Donnie Small Hands

 
Last edited:
By all accounts he was a good attorney. He's certainly made a boatload of money. He seems to have had a mental break. I'm wondering if he has a fondness for 18th century hats or something.

He was a great attorney. He baffles me. He was an attorney for the parents of JonBennet Ramsey who were family friends of ours. He represented them nobly. I have no idea what has happened to this guy.
 
EqwXr09XEAE-R_Z
 
The last three times a Republican has been elected president -- Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in both 2000 and 2004 -- Democrats in the House have brought objections to the electoral votes in states the GOP nominee won. In early 2005 specifically, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., along with Rep. Stephanie Tubbs, D-Ohio, objected to Bush's 2004 electoral votes in Ohio.


That forced the chambers to leave their joint session and debate separately for two hours on whether to reject Ohio's electoral votes. Neither did. But the objection by Boxer and Tubbs serves as a modern precedent for what is likely to happen in Congress on Jan. 6.

Notably, some Democrats lauded Boxer's move at the time, including Durbin himself.

"Some may criticize our colleague from California for bringing us here for this brief debate," Durbin said on the Senate floor following Boxer's objection, while noting that he would vote to certify the Ohio electoral votes for Bush. "I thank her for doing that because it gives members an opportunity once again on a bipartisan basis to look at a challenge that we face not just in the last election in one State but in many States."


Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., is another senator who previously praised Boxer.

"I believe that Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH) have performed a very valuable public service in bringing this debate before the Congress. As Americans, we should all be troubled by reports of voting problems in many parts of the country," Van Hollen, at the time a House member, said in a press release. "I have been particularly concerned about the lack of a verifiable paper record in connection with electronic voting systems. I am proud to be a co-sponsor of legislation to solve that problem."

.........

Amazing how then it was precedent and today it is a coup
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top