GDT 6/12 Atl vs Mutts

Yeah, sorry thethe... Camargo is good for a utility player... he sucks as a regular, just like we all assumed.
 
zbhargrove said:
Have you not paid attention to what he's done during the past month? Maybe you're referring to defense? I dunno, I haven't followed if he's any good defensively at third. Camargo has been awful with the bat.
Click to expand...

Culberson is a fine utility player, but he is not a good hitter. There is no “seeing what he can do”. We know what he can do. And regardless of whether Camargo proves he isn’t a full time player, he’s still a better player than Culberson.
 
CyYoung31 said:
Culberson is a fine utility player, but he is not a good hitter. There is no “seeing what he can do”. We know what he can do. And regardless of whether Camargo proves he isn’t a full time player, he’s still a better player than Culberson.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... I don't see how Camargo is for sure a better player.... he's been garbage. I'd say they are both about equally fine utility players. I'm not saying we see what he can do because he may be the future... I say see what he can do over Camargo because he's simply been better. I'm all about us getting an upgrade, but it looks doubtful we will get any kind of upgrade for some time.

Don't see much difference.... Culberson had a better minor league track record, was a first round draft pick that didn't completely work out... has only had over 96 at-bats in a season once in the MLB... please tell me how Camargo is clearly better.
 
Last edited:
zbhargrove said:
I'm still trying to figure out what was so weird about my comment... he's been light years better than Camargo
Click to expand...

The last 30 days Culberson has been propped up by an unsustainably high BABIP. He's not walking at all, and hasn't shown much power outside of two walk off homeruns. On the flipside, Camargo has been plagued by an insanely low BABIP the last 30 days, but has been walking a ton and flashing good power. His .781 OPS during the last month is pretty good and much more believable than Culberson's BABIP driven .903 OPS.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top