Some regression for Sean is likely but his current profile, imo, will lead to a low homerun rate.
probably not all-time low, however
Some regression for Sean is likely but his current profile, imo, will lead to a low homerun rate.
probably not all-time low, however
This is true. His average exit velocity on FB/LD is the 6th lowest in baseball among starters. Couple that with the fact he's getting a true fly ball % of 22.8% you can see why he's not giving up many homeruns.
Compare that to Julio who's true fly ball rate is 32.6% and 28th highest exit velocity on LD/FB and his homerun totals are really high.
The exit velocity and angle (fly ball, etc) against Newk really shows up in the barrels against stat. Barrels is a term to defined a great launch angle with great exit velocity. These are batted ball events where hitters just crush it. Newks Barrels per batted ball event against is only 2.8%. That's the 2nd best among starters this year.
Some regression for Sean is likely but his current profile, imo, will lead to a low homerun rate.
enscheff, what are using to say Ks typically go down for pitchers at this point? looking at just the top 30 pitchers in WAR on FG, a lot (majority?) of them had k-rate spikes after a few seasons in the league.
Velocity decreases immediately, but K/9 stays flat until the mid-20s due to improved control (using BB/9 as a proxy). This push/pull between velocity declining and control improving keeps FIP flat-ish until the late 20s. By the time a SP get into his late 20s, it's time to unload him...aka the Rays model.
Has anyone noticed Newks fastball is different speeds. Last night the gun was showing 89 to 95 but living mostly in the 91 to 94ish range. Wonder if he is taking some off to work on control.
Has anyone noticed Newks fastball is different speeds. Last night the gun was showing 89 to 95 but living mostly in the 91 to 94ish range. Wonder if he is taking some off to work on control.
How do we know his K rate won't go back up? If that happens, doesn't it offset some of the regression?
Honestly, I agree with the underlying message that Newcomb is going to regress.
The tone seems fairly dire, but it's not that big a deal unless you thought Newcomb and Folty were both #1 lock down aces.
I don't see any particular reason why the decline in his K rate over two months is necessarily determinative. It would seem entirely possible for it to pop back up with more of a sample. Unless their is a physical issue driving it, but I don't know why we would conclude that.
Personally, I think given Newcomb's control problems that his pitching more to contact isn't such a bad thing. May well let him stay deeper into games, given his weak contact rates.
While that may spike his results somewhat, it may well be better for the team to trade that off for longer outings. Don't know, depends on how you feel about the depth of the Braves pen.