GDT 8/17 vs friars

B

bravesfanforlife88

Well-known member
Bourn LF

Maybin CF

Markakis RF

AJ. C

Garcia 3b

Peterson 2b

Swisher 1b

Simmons. Ss

Perez

Solarte 3b

Sprangenberg 2b

Kemp Rf

JUp LF

Alonso 1b

Gyorko ss

Noris C

Veneble CF

Rea

Perez 4-3. 4.21 era

Rea 1-0. 5.40 era
 
Rea has probably pitched to tougher lineups in AAA.

Hopefully Williams can give us another outstanding start
 
Looks like Laz Diaz' strike zone extends about six inches in all directions when the Braves are batting. Sure hope he gives the same strikes to Perez as he's giving to Rea.
 
i7KUacq.jpg
 
3-0 already after a swinging bunt RBI and a wild pitch...this may be a short night for me in light of the two hour time difference..
 
I would really like for someone (those who are somehow confident in Perez) to explain to me why they think Williams Perez can be a Major League starter....
 
Way to hold onto the ball AJ.

I know AJ has had a great year, but I'm sick of playing a 38 year old catcher with a young guy tearing up AAA.
 
blueagleace1 said:
I would really like for someone (those who are somehow confident in Perez) to explain to me why they think Williams Perez can be a Major League starter....
Click to expand...

You think this inning is proof he won't be? Bad news for wisler and folty bc Perez has outpitched both.
 
msstate7 said:
You think this inning is proof he won't be? Bad news for wisler and folty bc Perez has outpitched both.
Click to expand...

This inning/game has no bearing on my opinion, I've said since the beginning that he isn't a MLB starter. Puts too many guys on base (as evident by just walking the opposing pitcher)
 
blueagleace1 said:
This inning/game has no bearing on my opinion, I've said since the beginning that he isn't a MLB starter. Puts too many guys on base (as evident by just walking the opposing pitcher)
Click to expand...

You know he's 24 year old rookie, right? I'm certainly not sold on him being a starter, but I won't discount his solid rookie year so far.
 
msstate7 said:
You know he's 24 year old rookie, right? I'm certainly not sold on him being a starter, but I won't discount his solid rookie year so far.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter how old he is, I don't care if he was 16. He puts way too many guys on-base, mostly by walks as the following stat shows: 44 K's / 33 BB in only 68 innings which if you say he throws 200 innings next year that equates to roughly 100 BB's in a season. How on earth can you say he's had a solid rookie year??
 
blueagleace1 said:
It doesn't matter how old he is, I don't care if he was 16. He puts way too many guys on-base, mostly by walks as the following stat shows: 44 K's / 33 BB in only 68 innings which if you say he throws 200 innings next year that equates to roughly 100 BB's in a season. How on earth can you say he's had a solid rookie year??
Click to expand...

Before he was injured, he had s 2.88 era in 8 starts and 3 relief appearances. He got roughed by philly and sf his first 2 starts after injury, but pitched a complete game vs TB in his last start.
 
blueagleace1 said:
What do you know... ANOTHER WALK.
Click to expand...

You should vent your frustration towards our offense that is full of guys with tons of mlb experience. We can't score off a rookie starter that's no better than Williams Perez. If AJ holds onto ball at plate, it's 2-0
 
msstate7 said:
Before he was injured, he had s 2.88 era in 8 starts and 3 relief appearances. He got roughed by philly and sf his first 2 starts after injury, but pitched a complete game vs TB in his last start.
Click to expand...

Yes he pitched really well against TB although he was extremely lucky in that start, as it's rare to walk 4 and only give up 2 runs. That still doesn't justify the "solid rookie year" statement.
 
msstate7 said:
You should vent your frustration towards our offense that is full of guys with tons of mlb experience. We can't score off a rookie starter that's no better than Williams Perez. If AJ holds onto ball at plate, it's 2-0
Click to expand...

I'm the total opposite of frustrated, I'm all on board of what Hart and Co. are doing. I simply asked a question that YOU responded to with a statement that had nothing to do with my question and yet you later said you agree that you aren't sold on him being a starter. If you'll go back (from the day he was called up) and look you'll see that I've never been "sold" on Perez even when he was pitching to a 2.88 ERA.
 
blueagleace1 said:
Yes he pitched really well against TB although he was extremely lucky in that start, as it's rare to walk 4 and only give up 2 runs. That still doesn't justify the "solid rookie year" statement.
Click to expand...

Here's all of perez's starts...

Vs TB -- 5.0 ip 1 er

At lad -- 6.0 ip 1 er

At sf -- 7.0 ip 0 er

Pitt -- 5.0 ip. 4 er

SD -- 7.0 ip 0 er

At Boston -- 6.0 ip 0 er

nym -- 6.0 ip 4 er

At pitt -- 4.2 ip 2 er (injured)

At philly -- 4.1 ip 9 er

SF -- 6.0 ip 5 er

At TB-- 8.0 ip 2 er

At sd -- 3.1 ip 3 er

I think that's solid. Maybe I'm wrong
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top