Acuna’s career stats in August:
.348/.408/.759/1.165 with 18 HRs.
No one said he averaged 100 MPH at any point in his career. Chapman is the only pitcher to average 100 mph over at least 1 full season since they started gauging pitch speed. Ryan absolutely averaged mid to upper 90's and touched 100 MPH regularly. This is documented. I not sure why anyone would argue against documented statistical facts. And he was still registering radar guns as high as 97 at age 42 (though he was only averaging 93 by this time).
The 108 mph comes from equating the difference in the points at which they were recorded. This site explains where this data comes from. Again, this isn't an opinion. I'm not sure why this argument is still going on and why people can't understand math or at least do a little research. I mean a 5 second google search of "Nolan Ryan mph" literally links you to several sites that state the exact thing I'm saying.
http://www.efastball.com/baseball/stats/fastest-pitch-speed-in-major-leagues/
I’m not prepared to take whatever that source is as the definitive word on the mathematics of the situation.
The implied claim that Ryan could throw a pitch three miles per hour faster than anyone (including himself) who has been measured the current way l ass one to question whether the methodology is accurate.
The recreated claim that this odd website proves this claim mathematically is bizarre.
There is zero way you actually came to this conclusion if you bothered to read the article. We already know Ryan was clocked at 100 MPH from 10 feet in front of the plate. Chapman was clocked about 105 just a few feet from where the ball left his hand. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out a ball loses velocity the closer it gets to the plate. Based on the measurements, velocity, and angle we can prove that Ryan's fastball crossed the plate at 99.1 MPH, while Chapman's crossed the plate at 96.5 MPH. Again, this is math, not an opinion. If you don't understand the math, then your argument is invalid. If you disgaree with the math, then please feel free to point out the flaws.
BTW, Bob Feller clocked in at 98.6 mph on a cronograph (typically more accurate than Radar) placed over home plate, making him the 2nd fastest ever.
My dad who watched Feller said he threw had, just like Koufax and especially Drysdale.
You might correct using science but when it crosses the plate that is what people said. Dad said and I even watched Ryan pitch he was inaccurate a lot. He believes like me he is between 92 to 98 on average but a devastating curve. He said he, Soto and Seaver threw that hard. Richard was a tier lower but his height intimidated hitters.
He said that Ryan curve was nasty but he said Blyleven was better and not close.
Ryan probably did average around 95-98 for much of his career (he himself acknoeledges this in his book). No one is gonna throw 100 mph every pitch (not even Chapman). But he did hit 100 mph throughout his career and was still touching a high of 97 as late as age 42.
My dad said the same thing. He said 92 to 95 or 94 on average and can touch 99 to a 100 but not accurate.
but then the hitters couldn't touch him.
Nowadays they would kill him.
So? Aaron, Mays, Mantle would not be inner circle HOFers in todays game. You are compared to your peers for a reason.
Good one, I asked that same question.
He said that Aaron would not have hit many homers and either Mays but they would be good mid level players until they've adjusted, Aaron would have. Lets say McGriff or Justice type of hitting and good hitters.
IMO they would still be HOFers but not top 5 players ever. The truth is many of todays top players would crush the game 50+ years ago. It's the same in most sports.
IMO they would still be HOFers but not top 5 players ever. The truth is many of todays top players would crush the game 50+ years ago. It's the same in most sports.
At the same time, give Aaron, Mantle, or Mays access to better facilities, diet programs, etc and perhaps they could have been even better. I feel pretty comfortable in saying Ted Williams would be Ted Williams in any era. He had better than perfect vision, super quick hands, and an incredible baseball IQ.
I just think the overall league has better talent in todays game. So their OPS+ and WAR numbers would be lower when playing with better players. Also they had no bullpen specialization back then.
There is zero way you actually came to this conclusion if you bothered to read the article. We already know Ryan was clocked at 100 MPH from 10 feet in front of the plate. Chapman was clocked about 105 just a few feet from where the ball left his hand. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out a ball loses velocity the closer it gets to the plate. Based on the measurements, velocity, and angle we can prove that Ryan's fastball crossed the plate at roughly 99.1 MPH, while Chapman's crossed the plate at roughly 96.5 MPH. Again, this is math, not an opinion. If you don't understand the math, then your argument is invalid. If you disgaree with the math, then please feel free to point out the flaws.
BTW, Bob Feller clocked in at 98.6 mph on a cronograph (typically more accurate than Radar) placed over home plate, making him the 2nd fastest ever.
So? Aaron, Mays, Mantle would not be inner circle HOFers in todays game. You are compared to your peers for a reason.