GDT: Marlins @ Braves 5/18

If the purpose of replay is to get it right it has to be overturned.

Yup. This.

There are some plays, like the ball trapped against the screen into the catcher's mitt, which are given an almost absurd amount of scrutiny.

Then plays which actually can be determined, definitively, aren't given the same treatment and ultimately tossed into the "not clear evidence" heap.

There's no consistency and it's really frustrating to watch.
 
If the purpose of replay is to get it right it has to be overturned. There are obviously other agendas at work in the replay system.

The purpose of the replay is to get it right under the rules set forth.. the rule is if the replay doesn't show enough evidence, then the call on the field stands. If you don't like that, then I will agree with you. But that play was a tie and therefore the call needs to stand.. if he was called safe, it would not have been overturned. If that was a Miami runner and they over turned that, everyone would still be bitching here. Take the tomahawk off the chest and you can clearly see that it was essentially a tie...
 
If it's possible to have a negative BABIP, we had one tonight. Half the outs we made we're rockets right at guys.

Combine ridiculous bad luck with even more ridiculous officiating and you get a shutout.

You can check statcast on BABIP for games I think, I'm not sure how though but to my eyes it was EXACTLY like the weekend series with the Giants the last home weekend series. Maybe not as bad but close. I'll try to delve in and see if I can dig it up.
 
Last edited:
The purpose of the replay is to get it right under the rules set forth.. the rule is if the replay doesn't show enough evidence, then the call on the field stands. If you don't like that, then I will agree with you. But that play was a tie and therefore the call needs to stand.. if he was called safe, it would not have been overturned. If that was a Miami runner and they over turned that, everyone would still be bitching here. Take the tomahawk off the chest and you can clearly see that it was essentially a tie...

The technology is so good that they can freeze it and eliminate ties. Freeze it at the right moment, and it becomes clear and convincing. I guess I didn't see the question on this one, or a couple of others over the past week or so. The cumulative effect of multiple costly replay rulings has started to wear on me.

They have the technology to get it right.
 
When Dansby is activated, it has to be one of Bautista or Culberson who is gone. I just can’t imagine any other way to do it unless they send Wisler back down. Even then, you’d need another reliever at some point soon since Gohara likely starts Wednesday.
 
When Dansby is activated, it has to be one of Bautista or Culberson who is gone. I just can’t imagine any other way to do it unless they send Wisler back down. Even then, you’d need another reliever at some point soon since Gohara likely starts Wednesday.

Before dansby went on dl, Preston was Gwinnett bound... could he him again
 
It makes me wonder what would have happened if that one Flower at bat had been called ball four like it should of. We would have had bases loaded with no outs with Inciarte coming up.
 
It makes me wonder what would have happened if that one Flower at bat had been called ball four like it should of. We would have had bases loaded with no outs with Inciarte coming up.

that would have helped.. but Ender didn't look great and Joey Bust was still lurking.
 
You can check statcast on BABIP for games I think, I'm not sure how though but to my eyes it was EXACTLY like the weekend series with the Giants the last home weekend series. Maybe not as bad but close. I'll try to delve in and see if I can dig it up.

You don’t need Statcast, BABIP is pretty easily calculated.
 
Back
Top