No Trump would have given attempted to buy the Ukraine to sell to Russia.
lol
No Trump would have given attempted to buy the Ukraine to sell to Russia.
I think Putin is more vulnerable to a coup than some think. Here's why:
1. Putin has surrounded himself with yes men- Putin's advisors have been telling him what he wants to hear for a long time. "We'll be welcomed into Ukraine as liberators" "The West will never put meaningful sanctions on us" "The Russian army is incredibly powerful, well trained, and well equipped". This let Putin to step into a quagmire that is Ukraine. Putin is now not happy. He's already started having people around him arrested. That breeds fear in people in positions of power, people with access to Putin. It might be easier for these supposedly loyal, like minded people to remove Putin than it would be to suffer his wrath.
2. He's denied the keptocrats their luxurious lifestyles- The elite in the government might all still be wealthy but a lot of them enjoyed luxurious lifestyles abroad. They can no longer dine in Paris or go skiing in Austria. Much of the loyalty Putin gained was gained through his ability to give these boons to his people. When they are denied, the loyalty erodes.
3. Billionaires are powerful no matter what- I've read numerous articles discounting the influence of the wealthy oligarchs. The articles say they are dependent upon Putin for their positions and wield little power. This isn't quite true. They are dependent upon the system for their positions, not Putin. Swapping in someone who will uphold the system but re-establish ties with the west would be desirable to them. As for power, money buys power. You need political power? It can allow you to give bribes. You need martial power? Mercenaries are still a thing.
The ingredients for a coup are there. That doesn't mean one will materialize but I think Putin isn't as coup proof as some try to say.
This whole fiasco is what happens when a not-too-smart man prone to paranoia and delusional thinking comes to power and surrounds himself with a bunch of sycophants. It is an enormous tragedy and strategic blunder of the first magnitude. I don't hold out much hope Putin will be gone anytime soon. Unfortunately for the Russian people, this means a long period of isolation. The economic costs to Russia are going to be very large.
[tw]1507081073074790400[/tw]
[tw]1507081073074790400[/tw]
I don’t buy into much of the “[insert politician here] is a Russian plant” stuff, but I’ll be damned if Tulsi doesn’t regularly find a way to give me pause.
The plant stuff is overblown. Establishing a plant is much more difficult than simply getting an idiot to bite on propaganda.
I and most would argue our policy concerning Russia is not nor has ever been regime change but as was the case post WWII containment.
As poor as the Russians are at conquering, conquering Russia via military or diplomatic/espionage means is and has for centuries been far more impossible
you could look that up or take Rand Paul's or any of the performance artists you seem attracted to word.
I'm also still wondering what exactly is the propaganda that Tulsi is sharing in this example.
If someone can help me with that I'd appreciate it.
Sanctions are regime change policy.
If you don't understand that then I'm not sure what to say.
we got another one ---- " what exactly is the propaganda "