Horsehide Harry
<B>Mr. Free Trade</B>
I would argue that it does matter. Matt is correct when he says that, eventually, folks will catch on and start running on him. If your team just gave Frenchy a contract in part because he controls base runners well, but that value was only based on his reputation, you just paid for past results instead of future performance. That is a mistake right out of the 1980s.
Statcast data measures his throws directly. With that data it is very easy to determine who is truly good at throwing the ball, and who is succeeding based on reputation.
This was exactly my point in bringing it up. My interest is mostly on paying for what defense/offense/combination is worth more than anything. And since statistical projection is based on historical events, I think at some point you have to make a human evaluation about whether you believe that those stats are going to improve, remain static or decline.