Okay, so you want less freedom to hypothetically make you safer. Whats the governments track record on that?
More blacks died in one year in Chicago than all of those shootings put together. But you’re white racist Ass never mentions black on black crimes. Do black deaths not mean a thing to you? Are black deaths not as important as white deaths? Why no mention of gun control in the inner cities?
More blacks died in one year in Chicago than all of those shootings put together. But you’re white racist Ass never mentions black on black crimes. Do black deaths not mean a thing to you? Are black deaths not as important as white deaths? Why no mention of gun control in the inner cities?
What freedoms do I give up to feel secure my Grandchildren won't be shot at school by a bi-polar ex janitor?
Or you and a date dont randomly get gunned down for going to a movie ?
Sturg and his fiance - if you will
Be specific.
We really dont know the track record -- do we ?
Hmm. I’ve posted about this, specifically, and though I don’t for a second think you’re saying this in good faith, I’ll reiterate: a huge proportion of the guns used in homicides in Chicago are legally straw-purchased in neighboring communities (many in Indiana) with far more lax purchasing requirements and laundered into Chicago. If you actually give a **** about this (spoiler alert: you don’t) you’d support measures to curtail such practices.
And you think that will keep schools safe?
Wouldn't that mean the gun homicide rate in Indiana is even higher than in Chicago, then?
Is that what the data says?
Hmm. I’ve posted about this, specifically, and though I don’t for a second think you’re saying this in good faith, I’ll reiterate: a huge proportion of the guns used in homicides in Chicago are legally straw-purchased in neighboring communities (many in Indiana) with far more lax purchasing requirements and laundered into Chicago. If you actually give a **** about this (spoiler alert: you don’t) you’d support measures to curtail such practices.[/QUOTE
The majority of those guns used in homicides are stolen not straw-purchased
Wouldn't that mean the gun homicide rate in Indiana is even higher than in Chicago, then?
Is that what the data says?
Hmm. I’ve posted about this, specifically, and though I don’t for a second think you’re saying this in good faith, I’ll reiterate: a huge proportion of the guns used in homicides in Chicago are legally straw-purchased in neighboring communities (many in Indiana) with far more lax purchasing requirements and laundered into Chicago. If you actually give a **** about this (spoiler alert: you don’t) you’d support measures to curtail such practices.[/QUOTE
The majority of those guns used in homicides are stolen not straw-purchased
I sincerely doubt that’s the case, given that the nationwide number is about 30%, and an alarming proportion of those are only reported as “stolen” after they’ve been used to commit a crime.
Wouldn't that mean the gun homicide rate in Indiana is even higher than in Chicago, then?
Is that what the data says?
It would be more apples to apples to compare Gary or Indianapolis to Chicago. I'm sure you understand that ~ 85 - 90% ~ of Indiana is rural
As you would find the same difference between Chicago and Illinois or Pennsylvania and Philadelphia
I read Julio3000's comment as suggesting that Chicago has a gun violence problem because there is easy access to guns in neighboring states.
That's a big leap in logic and doesn't hold up unless the data from those neighboring states shows a gun homicide rate of equal or more than Chicago.
I personally think Chicago's problem is a very high poverty rate
85% certain smoltzie is thethe