striker42
Well-known member
Did not realize George McClellan posted here.
This is the hardest I've ever laughed at a George McClellan joke. Well done.
Did not realize George McClellan posted here.
If Lee had commanded the union army, would the south had even lasted a full calendar year? Doubtful
Longstreet was treated unfairly. Lee wasn't perfect. He made mistakes. The Lost Cause tried to push these mistakes off on Longstreet because he collaborated with northerners after the war.
Longstreet was actually an excellent general and Lee knew it more than anyone. Longstreet opposed Pickett's charge in the strongest possible terms and was absolutely correct.
Still, Longstreet wasn't Jackson. The death of Stonewall Jackson, not Gettysburg, is the turning point of the war in the east to me. Lee was less audacious after that.
I've read speculation that some of the Union's struggles early on came from the fact that secession depleted its officer corp. That the southern aristocracy had a military tradition that resulted in a disproportionate number of the best trained officers being from the South.
However, I've never seen any numbers to back this up so I don't know if it's true or not.
That the southern aristocracy had a military tradition that resulted in a disproportionate number of the best trained officers being from the South.
Both Grant and Sherman expressed contempt for a certain type of brash young southern officer of aristocratic background. I believe the type (in somewhat altered form) survives to this day. You have probably encountered them in the courtroom.
Well Lee was less audacious after because he lost his numbers. You're not wrong that Jackson was huge for him.
Longstreet was generally a superior general to Jackson, Jackson was the more stoic leader.
Longstreet was a solid General. Don't get me wrong.