Hillary in trouble?

my lord so Pavlovian :)

- in fact the issue here are the leaks coming out the Intel Committee

Statement from Sen Feinstein ranking (D) on Intel Committee:

CZ7PJELWIAA3dxx.jpg:large
 
I would think the Red Shirts would slow down a little on accusations after the fiasco involving the videos and B Clintons recent sexual escapades.
But we have learned patience and reflection not a strong suit to that side of politics

If she is in reality culpable hey, what is right is what is right. I have seen this ongoing throwing **** against the wall and let's see what sticks involving HRC
ad nauseum.

So, let's scratch the surface.

"Even John Bolton, a senior Bush official who often championed executive secrecy, once complained, "If there is anyone who fully understands our ‘system’ for protecting classified information, I have yet to meet him."

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/29/10873106/hillary-clinton-email-top-secret
 
should my outrage and punishment be similar to the outrage and punishment when an actual president and his staff leak a covert cia agents name?

just wanting to know
 
57Brave said:
my lord so Pavlovian :)
- in fact the issue here are the leaks coming out the Intel Committee

Statement from Sen Feinstein ranking (D) on Intel Committee:

CZ7PJELWIAA3dxx.jpg:large
Click to expand...

Lol, I'm sorry, she's the secretary of the state. She was gonna have top secret stuff emailed to her, she shouldn't have had a private server. Period.
 
If you want a scandal, you can find one. This country has spent an absurd amount of money investigating petty matters related to the Clintons. It got old 20 years ago. As to the security of the emails, this isn't about security. She got the private server because she was paranoid about security.

As to Hillary, I don't like her to be honest with you. However I think she's the least bad candidate by a mile. Bernie could actually make me vote Republican for the first time in my 36 years. I would not take that lightly. I hate the class warfare.
 
Coredor said:
If you want a scandal, you can find one. This country has spent an absurd amount of money investigating petty matters related to the Clintons. It got old 20 years ago. As to the security of the emails, this isn't about security. She got the private server because she was paranoid about security.

As to Hillary, I don't like her to be honest with you. However I think she's the least bad candidate by a mile. Bernie could actually make me vote Republican for the first time in my 36 years. I would not take that lightly. I hate the class warfare.
Click to expand...

I don't think she was paranoid about security. As the person running their system up til 2013 had no security clearance or expertise in cyber security. Many experts say her server was highly at risk. Granted the small advantage would be that there would be less attacks on her server because it's not as known as federal servers, but if anyone caught wind, it could be bad, And twice her server was scanned by a computer in serbia, to what end, who knows.

The issue for her is she got busted. She claims that other SotS used private email clients as well, which is a valid concern, but cyber security and cyber terrorism were much different in 2000 than 2008. Don't get me wrong, I don't think she did anything particularly wrong in the sense that she endangered people, but I do think she made a poor decision not to use the State server considering everything that was going on.
 
crooks ?

ok?
////

Sturg if you want to talk about crooks, you are more than welcome to comment in the Flint,Mich thread
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top