BedellBrave
It's OVER 5,000!
different rules for "icons"
Yep..."let's police ourselves since we are so good at it."
different rules for "icons"
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/media/nbc-matt-lauer.html
Another one bites the dust. Who is going to be left?
Who determines 'inappropriate' behavior?
if it's a complaint from a trusted employee, i'm guessing the company does.
NBC wouldn't fire Lauer on a flimsy accusation from a random employee.
I get it but 'inappropriate' has changed significantly in the last 50 years. Mostly in a good way of course but the concern is a recent article that I read saying that 25% of women say complimenting their looks is sexual harassment. We are entering dangerous territory in my opinion.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/business/media/nbc-matt-lauer.html
Another one bites the dust. Who is going to be left?
Who determines 'inappropriate' behavior?
This needs to end. It’s starting to look like the feminist inquisition.
This needs to end. It’s starting to look like the feminist inquisition.
The accused have overwhelmingly admitted to doing inappropriate things toward women, though.
At what point do we look at human nature and say this is how we were created?
Nobody is arguing that women should be raped or sexually harassed but only that men are programmed to chase women.
But the majority of (maybe all?) the high profile cases aren't about men being sexually interested in women. They're about men doing **** like groping women or whipping out their dicks. I've really not seen someone go down over respectful attempts at courting. There might be a meaningful conversation regarding whether it should be acceptable to flirt in the workplace, but I think we all need to agree that masturbating in front of a woman at work is a red line.
Yes - That is despicable and is more an indictment on the mental faculty of the individual.
However, what is considered respectful attempts at courting? If men were to stop trying after being told no once what would our population look like now? There are large percentages of women who want to be chased and want a man who is resilient.
Maybe a little thinner, but it's a world I'd be happy to live in. I think it's perfectly fair to draw a line at no meaning no in all circumstances.
At what point do we look at human nature and say this is how we were created?
Nobody is arguing that women should be raped or sexually harassed but only that men are programmed to chase women.
I'm not talking about sex. When a woman says no that absolutely means no in my book.
I'm talking about courting/flirting. No doesn't always mean no. Sometimes no means a women wants to know how interested a man is in her.
Not too much to ask them to confine such activity to outside the workplace.
Definitely a fair argument.
What about at celebrations outside of the workplace? Happy hours?
I'm glad my dad didn't take the first No as final