striker42
Well-known member
As MLB has added more teams to the playoffs, it seems to have created more issues that MLB hasn't always addressed. So I'm curious how everyone would change the playoffs to improve them. I'm personally assuming that the number of teams stays the same as I doubt MLB is ever going to decrease the number of playoff games and give up that money.
The biggest problem for me is that the regular season is increasingly irrelevant. Baseball isn't like football where the better team will most often win a single matchup. Bad teams beat great teams in regular season series all the time. When you have a 5 game or a 3 game series, all of a sudden a lucky AB or a pitcher just not having his best stuff can sink a 162 game season. So I'd make a couple of changes.
First, I'd let the teams pick their playoff times based on their regular season record. If you want that 7:00 PM slot, win in the regular season and you can pick it. This rewards teams for succeeding in the regular season by giving them the financial boost of better playoff attendance and also lets their team have more normal prep routines.
Second, I'd reseed after the wild card round. It's ridiculous that the Braves had a better record than the Dodgers and are being rewarded by being forced to face off against a better team in the NLDS. If you guarantee the best record faces the worst record in the NLDS, it makes the regular season record even more relevant.
Third, I'd play the wild card round over 2 days with a double header the first day. I'd then start the NLDS the day after the wild card series end. If you don't get a bye and you want a day off between series, you better sweep the double header. Either way, this makes the bye much more attractive. If a team throws their top two pitchers in the double header, they wont be able to start again until probably game 3 of the NLDS.
I'm tempted to make the wild card series longer as I think a 3 game playoff series is ridiculous. Success over 162 games can be wiped out over 2 games. Seems harsh. But I can't figure out how to do it while simultaneously using a double header to incentivize getting the bye.
What would everyone else do?
The biggest problem for me is that the regular season is increasingly irrelevant. Baseball isn't like football where the better team will most often win a single matchup. Bad teams beat great teams in regular season series all the time. When you have a 5 game or a 3 game series, all of a sudden a lucky AB or a pitcher just not having his best stuff can sink a 162 game season. So I'd make a couple of changes.
First, I'd let the teams pick their playoff times based on their regular season record. If you want that 7:00 PM slot, win in the regular season and you can pick it. This rewards teams for succeeding in the regular season by giving them the financial boost of better playoff attendance and also lets their team have more normal prep routines.
Second, I'd reseed after the wild card round. It's ridiculous that the Braves had a better record than the Dodgers and are being rewarded by being forced to face off against a better team in the NLDS. If you guarantee the best record faces the worst record in the NLDS, it makes the regular season record even more relevant.
Third, I'd play the wild card round over 2 days with a double header the first day. I'd then start the NLDS the day after the wild card series end. If you don't get a bye and you want a day off between series, you better sweep the double header. Either way, this makes the bye much more attractive. If a team throws their top two pitchers in the double header, they wont be able to start again until probably game 3 of the NLDS.
I'm tempted to make the wild card series longer as I think a 3 game playoff series is ridiculous. Success over 162 games can be wiped out over 2 games. Seems harsh. But I can't figure out how to do it while simultaneously using a double header to incentivize getting the bye.
What would everyone else do?