If Trump strips naked and starts raping white house assistants would you still support him?
I didn’t vote for Trump but I’m cautiously optimistic
- Thread starter chop2chip
- Start date
If Trump strips naked and starts raping white house assistants would you still support him?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You would call it fake news and claim it's a deep fake. We know you have no standards.
If Trump went to congress and shot all the Democrats would you still support him?
Many didn't need them after the pardon. Stone dropped his appeals.
What the funny part was Flynn's trial when evidence came to light that he was railroaded and the charges should be dropped the judge kept trying to push it anyway.
Most people see correctly that these trials were political including most legal scholars who aren't infected with TDS.
Last edited by a moderator:
Tapate50
Well-known member
Just people desperate for publicity
sturg33
I
BL
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
cuz i'm a leftist who is not fact based in my beliefs
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
i think they are the reason the American economy has become more monopolistic and concentrated...they have become very adept at shielding their businesses from competition
Last edited by a moderator:
Tapate50
Well-known member
Flawed belief systems created flawed outcomes
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
so sayeth Ivermectin Man
Tapate50
Well-known member
INDEED
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.
Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.
Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
I continue to be impressed with the research conducted by you and the wife.
It is far more impressive than the drivel I cling to: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
It is far more impressive than the drivel I cling to: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
sturg33
I
Was that the same drivel that told you wearing two masks was a smart idea?
Oh BL - Falling for the same trap over and over again. Same reason why you still claim HCQ isn't effective:
Methods
We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive platform trial involving symptomatic SARS-CoV-2–positive adults recruited from 12 public health clinics in Brazil. Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo. (The trial also involved other interventions that are not reported here.) The primary composite outcome was hospitalization due to Covid-19 within 28 days after randomization or an emergency department visit due to clinical worsening of Covid-19 (defined as the participant remaining under observation for >6 hours) within 28 days after randomization.
Ivermectin didn't work when given to risky patients who have had symptons for a week! YOu see it doesn't work?
Rest of us: We never said Ivermectin worked after the patient was ill and had co-morbidities.
Yeah, Ivermectin and HCQ work best within 2-3 days of having Covid.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I get some things wrong but most of what you would claiming was wrong about are things that you projected onto me or things where where you apply distorted facts that aren't reality.
Who was right Trump would lose in 2020? Not you.
Who was wrong several times in predictions Trump would overturn the election because of voter fraud? That would be you.
Who was wrong Trump would win in a landslide.nthatbeiiod be you.
Who said the vote would be decertified despite me telling you over and over again that's not a thing. That would be you.
Who said Covid restrictions would end the day after the election. that was you.
Who said Trump would try to stay in power after losing that would be me.
Who said there would be a red wave in 2022. That would be you.
I feel pretty good about my track record compared to you Nostradumbass.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
He could technically do this now thanks to the Supreme Court.