Trouble is with that solution is it will be heard to target their communications network without getting into everyone else's.
Agreed. This will not be an easy war and will be waged for decades.
Trouble is with that solution is it will be heard to target their communications network without getting into everyone else's.
The first metric in the argument uses a time frame that ends in 2005. How is that relevan now?
I disagree. I would never act as if I'm an expert on Islamic scripture but from everything I've read the religion is inherently violent. I think bedell could really expand on this.
Do you believe the Quran changed in the last 10 years, or do you think that just maybe the conditions in the Middle East may have played a part in any changes to that percentage?
Have you read the ****ing Old Testament? You can point to evidence of an angry and vengeful God in any scripture.
Well, at least you're consistent.
I don't like it. It's was delivered tactlessly and smacks of intolerance.
But when people use language like, 'The Statue of Liberty is crying now' or any number of other truly hysterical portrayals of this order that I've read today (here, there, and everywhere) it prompts the devil's advocate in me. There is real logic in thoroughly scrutinizing the refugee program. I'm happy to concede this isn't the best one.
I will say, though, that individuals who choose not to worry, or dismiss the worries of others, about the coalescing of Muslim populations in America (especially these Syrian refugees; who are vulnerable and susceptible to radicalization - not to mention that the vast majority were born into a strict Sharia environment under Gadaffi) need to go visit Molenbeek in Brussels or Neukölln in Berlin or Blackburn in the United Kingdom and tell me if that's what they are comfortable with America embracing in any way shape or form.
I'm not a fan of any organized religon. All I see is that almost 100% of global terrorist acts are perpetrated by muslims.
There are problems and challenges in European assimilation of migrant minorities. No kidding. There are also notable successes.
Also, this is not Europe. Let's not let scaremongering drive policy.
Except in the United States, Europe or pretty much anywhere that doesn't have Islam as the overwhelming majority religion. I wonder why terror attacks in heavily Muslim areas might be perpetrated by Muslims. Surely it's the religion itself.
I'm not even sure how to respond to this. How about all the terrorism in just the west the last 10 years? How is this even debateable that Islam is at the heart of these attacks?
Some of the stats I cited for Europe are from the last 10 years. The numbers don't match the perception.
I'm sorry but which stats are you referring to?
And let's not ignore what has happened in Europe as if it could not happen here.
Image wouldn't work on mobile, so here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/14/are-all-terrorists-muslims-it-s-not-even-close.html
And in saying that, I'm not co-signing your idea of what has "happened" in Europe. I'm just positing it that it's dumb policy to reflexively react to something so removed from our context.
I disagree. I would never act as if I'm an expert on Islamic scripture but from everything I've read the religion is inherently violent. I think bedell could really expand on this.