Is Free Speech Under Attack in this Country?

If sturg has any evidence that proves he isn't trying to get Twitter to loosen its standards so he can share child pornography, I'm all ears. I'll wait.
 
Its also worth noting that Jack Dorsey said they were wrong to restrict the sharing of it.

The leftists on this board just can't get on the side of disagreeing with censorship though
 
sturg33 said:
They already allow it.

But child pornography is illegal. They probably shouldn't.

Great point though.
Click to expand...

Consistent attempt to blur the line between wholesome adult porn and child porn. Just like a child pornographer.

Now that you admit your perfidy I'm calling the A-team to track you down.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Consistent attempt to blur the line between wholesome adult porn and child porn. Just like a child pornographer.

Now that you admit your perfidy I'm calling the A-team to track you down.
Click to expand...

good catch...i missed that...what a tricky devil he is turning out to be...i still want to see the metadata on his being a child pornographer
 
nsacpi said:
Apparently he is unhappy that the rest of us don't have strong feelings about the matter.

It is not acceptable to take the humble view that this is a business matter best left to twitter.
Click to expand...

Just pointing out that your corporate overlords are dictating what you see.

Something something election interference something something greatest threat to democravy
 
Child porn being brought into the mix

Lol


I laugh and know fb was a fraud

Didn’t know he was also qanon lol
 
If you are trying to convince us you dont know what illegal election interference is then you are succeeding. Maybe we can get shock collars on journalists that read their minds and if they have anything but a neutral thought they get a strong shock. The media is not obligated to report the news how you want. You however are free to choose from thousands and thousands of places to get your news.




Explain to me how the NY Post releasing a highly dubious story is not an example of what you call corporate overlords interfering in the election but twatter blocking the sharing of it is.



You know Googlani could just released this himself but he has less than zero credibility so they get the NY Post to put it out there. Googliani said he gave it to them because they would print it without vetting it first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top