As a matter of constitutional law, the Chair of the FCC threatening companies in order to coerce them to fire someone whose political speech he doesn’t like is about as straightforward a violation of the First Amendment as you can get. “Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors.” Nat'l Rifle Ass'n of Am. v. Vullo, 602 U.S. 175, 180 (2024). Like, that’s a 9-0 supreme court ruling from the current fractured court there. That Kimmel ended up being immediately punished and the FCC director basically said “Thank you,” is, uh, bad optics, at best.
Deeper problem being showcased here is how “free speech” is often actually kind of an antitrust problem. Kimmel was screwed when Nexstar/Sinclair flexed their muscle against him because they wield outsized power in the tv space after gobbling up all the local stations. Similar to when whatever lunatics you guys loved couldn’t get their books on amazon. The problem is not, strictly speaking, that a private company didn’t want to do business with him (companies also have first amendment association rights)—the problem is Amazon has (had?) monopoly in the book market, so that single point of denial has outsized impact.
Corporate consolidation is bad for free speech (and is antidemocratic in other ways), just generally speaking.